RANT CORNER

A place to discuss anything.
Post Reply
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 23683
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am
Location: UK

If some idiot talking about covid is worth £150M to Spotify, what price would they put on my exclusive ranting? :roll:
greenmark
Posts: 5019
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:15 pm

Derek27 wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 1:55 pm
If some idiot talking about covid is worth £150M to Spotify, what price would they put on my exclusive ranting? :roll:
What's the smallest denomination of currency at the moment? :-)
But seriously, anyone that ignites the ire of Joni Mitchell and Neil Young is quite probably a self-serving, monetizing, misinformer.
Trader Pat
Posts: 4327
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:50 pm

To me it was just another example of artists thinking they're more relevant than they are

Neil Young: "They can have Rogan or Young. Not both.”
Spotify: "Bye Neil!"

:D
greenmark
Posts: 5019
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:15 pm

Trader Pat wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:08 pm
To me it was just another example of artists thinking they're more relevant than they are

Neil Young: "They can have Rogan or Young. Not both.”
Spotify: "Bye Neil!"

:D
Perhaps you're making a good point here. Why should I accept the opinion's of two musicians that I like? Maybe I should look at Rogan's output and make my own judgement.
Trader Pat
Posts: 4327
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:50 pm

greenmark wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:31 pm
Trader Pat wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:08 pm
To me it was just another example of artists thinking they're more relevant than they are

Neil Young: "They can have Rogan or Young. Not both.”
Spotify: "Bye Neil!"

:D
Perhaps you're making a good point here. Why should I accept the opinion's of two musicians that I like? Maybe I should look at Rogan's output and make my own judgement.
Its just another example of cancel culture imo, if they disagree with the guys views then don't listen to his podcast.
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 23683
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am
Location: UK

greenmark wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:31 pm
Trader Pat wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:08 pm
To me it was just another example of artists thinking they're more relevant than they are

Neil Young: "They can have Rogan or Young. Not both.”
Spotify: "Bye Neil!"

:D
Perhaps you're making a good point here. Why should I accept the opinion's of two musicians that I like? Maybe I should look at Rogan's output and make my own judgement.
As far as I understand, they're not asking people to accept their opinions but simply deciding they don't want to be associated with Spotify, perhaps hoping to hurt Spotify and draw attention to their feelings in the process.
greenmark
Posts: 5019
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:15 pm

greenmark wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:31 pm
Trader Pat wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:08 pm
To me it was just another example of artists thinking they're more relevant than they are

Neil Young: "They can have Rogan or Young. Not both.”
Spotify: "Bye Neil!"

:D
Perhaps you're making a good point here. Why should I accept the opinion's of two musicians that I like? Maybe I should look at Rogan's output and make my own judgement.
Bloody hell. That's an hour of my life I'll never get back. Just listened to Rogan's interview with Dr. Robert Malone. What a fraudster! Perhaps Rogan likes to exploit the position of devil's advocate. But I won't be listening to this drivel again.
Trader Pat
Posts: 4327
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:50 pm

greenmark wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:39 pm
greenmark wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:31 pm
Trader Pat wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:08 pm
To me it was just another example of artists thinking they're more relevant than they are

Neil Young: "They can have Rogan or Young. Not both.”
Spotify: "Bye Neil!"

:D
Perhaps you're making a good point here. Why should I accept the opinion's of two musicians that I like? Maybe I should look at Rogan's output and make my own judgement.
Bloody hell. That's an hour of my life I'll never get back. Just listened to Rogan's interview with Dr. Robert Malone. What a fraudster! Perhaps Rogan likes to exploit the position of devil's advocate. But I won't be listening to this drivel again.
You're a better man than me I've never listened to any of his podcasts.
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 23683
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am
Location: UK

greenmark wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:39 pm
greenmark wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:31 pm
Trader Pat wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:08 pm
To me it was just another example of artists thinking they're more relevant than they are

Neil Young: "They can have Rogan or Young. Not both.”
Spotify: "Bye Neil!"

:D
Perhaps you're making a good point here. Why should I accept the opinion's of two musicians that I like? Maybe I should look at Rogan's output and make my own judgement.
Bloody hell. That's an hour of my life I'll never get back. Just listened to Rogan's interview with Dr. Robert Malone. What a fraudster! Perhaps Rogan likes to exploit the position of devil's advocate. But I won't be listening to this drivel again.
A whole hour to realise he's talking crap?? :lol:
greenmark
Posts: 5019
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:15 pm

Derek27 wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 10:36 pm
greenmark wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:39 pm
greenmark wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:31 pm

Perhaps you're making a good point here. Why should I accept the opinion's of two musicians that I like? Maybe I should look at Rogan's output and make my own judgement.
Bloody hell. That's an hour of my life I'll never get back. Just listened to Rogan's interview with Dr. Robert Malone. What a fraudster! Perhaps Rogan likes to exploit the position of devil's advocate. But I won't be listening to this drivel again.
A whole hour to realise he's talking crap?? :lol:
These people prevaricate and squirm and self-hype before they go for the money. I waited and waited. Then the hydroxychloroquine crap pops up and 10 seconds of googling appear to blow (if you believe The Lancet) Malone's claims out of the water. I'll listen and then check on what I hear.
User avatar
alexmr2
Posts: 766
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 12:32 am

greenmark wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 11:22 pm
These people prevaricate and squirm and self-hype before they go for the money. I waited and waited. Then the hydroxychloroquine crap pops up
It's not just about the money, it's about getting as many people as possible to take hydroxychloroquine horse medicine so that they turn into horses. This will lead to a horse racing-based global society and more liquidity on the exchange which is the ultimate goal so that Rogan can increase his pre-off edge
User avatar
Naffman
Posts: 5644
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:46 am

alexmr2 wrote:
Tue Feb 01, 2022 2:14 pm
greenmark wrote:
Mon Jan 31, 2022 11:22 pm
These people prevaricate and squirm and self-hype before they go for the money. I waited and waited. Then the hydroxychloroquine crap pops up
It's not just about the money, it's about getting as many people as possible to take hydroxychloroquine horse medicine so that they turn into horses. This will lead to a horse racing-based global society and more liquidity on the exchange which is the ultimate goal so that Rogan can increase his pre-off edge
:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 23683
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am
Location: UK

Sarah-Jane Mee picking her nose on Sky News! :shock:
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 23683
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am
Location: UK

Of 4 matches I could have traded at six, I've picked the one that doesn't go in-play. :x
Trader Pat
Posts: 4327
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:50 pm

Derek27 wrote:
Tue Feb 01, 2022 6:03 pm
Of 4 matches I could have traded at six, I've picked the one that doesn't go in-play. :x
Give yourself a yellow card for that one Dex that's a rookie mistake ;)
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion”