That first paragraph simply isn't correct. And for someone with so little experience you should be careful of making assertions like that because you'll close your eyes to all the other considerations.decomez6 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:21 amAnd the only way to convert a simple strategy into a winning one is by timing and conditioning,
The ‘ELEPHANT in the ROOM is , how can a collective imaginative capacity of a forum like this cannot Convert a simple strategy like the one proposed here into a profitable one?
This video from Peter is a brilliant way of converting a simple strategy into a winning one.
As for the 2nd paragraph then your strategy appears to be based on hope rather than anything fundamental. You can't just pick a random idea and coax it into life. Your idea that you'll make it work by collective imagination is falling into that trap.
I haven't watched that video but I assume you're referring to devising a strategy and then addressing the losers, leaving you with just the winners. Again that's naive and over simplistic.
The one question you haven't addressed is why this strategy should work. Your enthusiasm is great but you're missing so much, even when it come to results several days or even several weeks of wins means nothing without you being able to measure if that gain is coming from an edge or natural varience. You've just picked a random idea and are making random changes, that's not how it's done.