You seem to believe that BJ woke one morning last week with the thought that he would arrange for the changes and that no consultation or approval would have taken place. This process started in April 2021 with the appointment of Lord Geidt.
boris and rishi partygate fines
-
firlandsfarm
- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
-
firlandsfarm
- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
All based on the biased conjecture of a Boris basher. Get a life, stop choking on someone else's cake and move forward. What actual harm or losses have been caused by any of these biased claims?Derek27 wrote: ↑Sun May 29, 2022 8:08 amThe meeting was secret in that, it should never have happened, if it did happen it should have been transparent and the public are entitled to know about it. They kept quiet about it and it took an investigative journalist to blow their cover, a month after the meeting.
Given the level of dishonesty in the present government, it's reasonable for the public to be concerned that BJ would try to influence the investigation. Both, Downing Street and Sue Gray won't say what the meeting was about, so something fishy seems to be going on.
"How desperate can you get?" was a joke relating to the way it looks. Nonetheless, it's quite ironic with all the lying and lawbreaking that it's now more acceptable and you can get away with it without losing your job.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Sun May 29, 2022 12:07 pmYou seem to believe that BJ woke one morning last week with the thought that he would arrange for the changes and that no consultation or approval would have taken place. This process started in April 2021 with the appointment of Lord Geidt.
It's not a biased claim, it's a matter of fact that they had a meeting and it's not denied by either party. If they won't say what the purpose of the meeting was it's a fair assumption that he was trying to influence her report. He's not exactly an honest person, is he?firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Sun May 29, 2022 12:13 pmAll based on the biased conjecture of a Boris basher. Get a life, stop choking on someone else's cake and move forward. What actual harm or losses have been caused by any of these biased claims?Derek27 wrote: ↑Sun May 29, 2022 8:08 amThe meeting was secret in that, it should never have happened, if it did happen it should have been transparent and the public are entitled to know about it. They kept quiet about it and it took an investigative journalist to blow their cover, a month after the meeting.
Given the level of dishonesty in the present government, it's reasonable for the public to be concerned that BJ would try to influence the investigation. Both, Downing Street and Sue Gray won't say what the meeting was about, so something fishy seems to be going on.
-
The Silk Run
- Posts: 922
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2018 12:53 am
- Location: United Kingdom
Did somebody mention Party 
BJ's at another party. This time it's a tea party at a care home.
-
The Silk Run
- Posts: 922
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2018 12:53 am
- Location: United Kingdom
https://youtu.be/WfVJUKlbWVwfirlandsfarm wrote: ↑Sun May 29, 2022 12:07 pmYou seem to believe that BJ woke one morning last week with the thought that he would arrange for the changes and that no consultation or approval would have taken place. This process started in April 2021 with the appointment of Lord Geidt.
You should have heard the laughter from the Question Time audience when a panellist believed BJ didn't lie to parliament.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Sun May 29, 2022 12:13 pmAll based on the biased conjecture of a Boris basher. Get a life, stop choking on someone else's cake and move forward. What actual harm or losses have been caused by any of these biased claims?Derek27 wrote: ↑Sun May 29, 2022 8:08 amThe meeting was secret in that, it should never have happened, if it did happen it should have been transparent and the public are entitled to know about it. They kept quiet about it and it took an investigative journalist to blow their cover, a month after the meeting.
Given the level of dishonesty in the present government, it's reasonable for the public to be concerned that BJ would try to influence the investigation. Both, Downing Street and Sue Gray won't say what the meeting was about, so something fishy seems to be going on.
Reports of a second gathering, aka party, on BJ's birthday, which may be investigated by the Privileges Committee. Starmer having a beer with his meal, in the absence of a kareoke machine seems quite tame and forgotten about now.
I’m not sure many people give two hoots about any lockdown partying in the sense that they’re annoyed about it. Considering it was one of the most drastic measures in modern times, if people gave a fuck they’d be out protesting. You could hear a pin drop for public interest.
The confusing part about the partying, be it Boris, Kier or the Ginger Growler is that they obviously weren’t fearing the pandemic, so their personal actions didn’t mirror their public projections. It was clearly not as serious as they lead people to believe.
The confusing part about the partying, be it Boris, Kier or the Ginger Growler is that they obviously weren’t fearing the pandemic, so their personal actions didn’t mirror their public projections. It was clearly not as serious as they lead people to believe.
Number of letters sent to the 1922 committed up to 26.
If I was gonna get involved I'd be inclined to lay the no-confidence vote as he's got too much support from gutless Tory MPs but I'd back the clown to be out of office before the next election when they realise he's a liability.
Talking of clowns, Tales from the Dark Side, If the Shoes Fit episode. BJ could have starred in it.
If I was gonna get involved I'd be inclined to lay the no-confidence vote as he's got too much support from gutless Tory MPs but I'd back the clown to be out of office before the next election when they realise he's a liability.
Talking of clowns, Tales from the Dark Side, If the Shoes Fit episode. BJ could have starred in it.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
jamesg46 wrote: ↑Mon May 30, 2022 11:00 amThe confusing part about the partying, be it Boris, Kier or the Ginger Growler is that they obviously weren’t fearing the pandemic, so their personal actions didn’t mirror their public projections. It was clearly not as serious as they lead people to believe.
They lied about everything but would never lie about there being a deadly virus, they definitely told the truth on that one and anyone that assumes they might have lied is a conspiracy theorist.
Just look how quiet the roads are and how cheap houses are from all the people that died after walking past each other every day in supermarkets during it