yes, there is such an abundance of indicators that it really depends on how you measure them and how you then implement change as a result. on a related topic (metrics etc.), I only today finally put to rest the fact that races at Galway produce a poor average for the particular rules that I run in-play. this only became apparent when i scanned the data for the past 4 weeks and noted that the biggest average losses were sustained here, across all race distances. likewise a few months back, a similar metric (plotted over time), revealed that races > 16 furlongs are a big loser for the same rule set also (altho ironically, can sometimes produce the highest *win* (i.e profit) of any single race type).RentonT wrote:I think both ROI (bank) and return on turnover are worth monitoring because they both show useful performance indicators.
I couldn't get my manually worked out turnover to match the one betfair gave me so I guess I will just ask them each day for it.
I also look at my avg win vs avg. loss as I want to improve my avg loss figure. And strike rate is important too as this together with the avg win and loss affects results.
so in conclusion, the complexion of your p&l really can act as a guide and therefore alter your fwd game. i think of it as applying change in a subtractive manner!!
