ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Wed Jan 24, 2018 2:26 am
AlchemistMoz wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2018 10:55 pm
Or should I enter the next over/under market and put an even higher back bet in order to increase my profits over the loss. And so forth.
I'll just pick up on one thing which I see as the most fundamental, never never
never increase your trade size to cover a loss. If it wasn't a good idea to go big anyway then why is it a good idea to go big now? You're going to have losing trades, losing days and even losing weeks, treat every situation purely on its own merits and
never on the outcome of a trade you did 5 minutes ago. Even a strategy that pays 80% of the time will have losing streaks longer than your bank or the market can accommodate...
Thanks for the reply, and warning! Unfortunately

I managed to chase my losses with bigger bets before I had a time to read your post. I was close to
loosing half my br!!! But luckily I came to my senses and managed to get away with
"only" 15% loss of total br. It's as you said "If it wasn't a good idea to go big anyway then why is it a good idea to go big now?". Really makes sense.
I tried practice mode, but I've learned so much more doing it for real as every trade has more of an impact. The money I'm playing with is some small earnings from matched betting, so any big losses wont get me too much of a headache.
But what is the standard strategy when it comes to losses? Cash out immediately and accept the loss? Seems sensible enough, if you manage to have more wins then losses. But is this how more experienced traders do it?
Lets say I'm trading the reaction on goals (over/under markets). First goal is scored, I enter the 2.5 market and trade on the reaction. But if the second goal is scored before I have time to make a profit, lets say within 3-4 minutes, what should I do?
Usually (after entering and exiting the 2.5 market succesfully from the first goal), on the second goal, I enter the 3.5 market. So in the above scenario with the 3-4 min gap between the two goals, why not let the 2.5 market bet ride for as long as the 3.5 bet does? This would minimize my losses, but in case of a third goal before the 3.5 market trade is a profit, it would increase my losses even more, since the 2.5 market bet will be lost completely.
In my head this sounds like a fair strategy, since three goals so tight after each other doesn't feel that likely, but my gut feeling is telling me that it's not good enough. And also because that's exactly what happened when I almost lost half my br... But in that case I increased my bets, martingale style, but now I'm thinking about continue business as normal, but also minimize the loss by riding it out for a short while. Any thoughts?