Cheltenham Festival 2018

The sport of kings.
Post Reply
Wolf1877
Posts: 369
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 10:59 am

Ha, I got stung on that first Cheltenham race.

My personal in house automated form system had identified Summerville Boy as the strongest horse for the going so I placed a larger bet than normal expecting others to see what I can see and the market to shorten only for the market to drift rapidly just before the off and then drift further in the early in play so I bailed out for a 30% loss, only to see that my form assessment was right all along and the bloody thing won. Interesting to see the market manipulation is happening even at these volumes which I really didnt expect!

So basically I called the race right, the market disagreed with me, I bottled it and lost money. I'm definitely leaving Cheltenham to the big boys now.
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 25157
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am

Dallas wrote:
Tue Mar 13, 2018 1:43 pm
I couldn't resist a small last minute 'bet' on that, simply because I did a YTS straight from school at a placed called 'Summerville'
So did I, £25 per week to do somebody else's job for him. :lol:

You must be no older than me as I was on the very first YTS.
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 25157
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am

Wolf1877 wrote:
Tue Mar 13, 2018 1:49 pm
Ha, I got stung on that first Cheltenham race.

My personal in house automated form system had identified Summerville Boy as the strongest horse for the going so I placed a larger bet than normal expecting others to see what I can see and the market to shorten only for the market to drift rapidly just before the off and then drift further in the early in play so I bailed out for a 30% loss, only to see that my form assessment was right all along and the bloody thing won. Interesting to see the market manipulation is happening even at these volumes which I really didnt expect!

So basically I called the race right, the market disagreed with me, I bottled it and lost money. I'm definitely leaving Cheltenham to the big boys now.
I learnt from my gambling days, the market doesn't often agree with you because everybody looks at a race from a different angle.
User avatar
brimson25
Posts: 506
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 11:42 am

Naffman wrote:
Tue Mar 13, 2018 1:38 pm
No money in the 2nd race 30 mins out
Is that because Footpad is dominant in the market, but not quite dominant enough for people to go nuts on it? And that's such a small field? Interesting anyway.
Wolf1877
Posts: 369
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 10:59 am

Derek27 wrote:
Tue Mar 13, 2018 1:54 pm
Wolf1877 wrote:
Tue Mar 13, 2018 1:49 pm
Ha, I got stung on that first Cheltenham race.

My personal in house automated form system had identified Summerville Boy as the strongest horse for the going so I placed a larger bet than normal expecting others to see what I can see and the market to shorten only for the market to drift rapidly just before the off and then drift further in the early in play so I bailed out for a 30% loss, only to see that my form assessment was right all along and the bloody thing won. Interesting to see the market manipulation is happening even at these volumes which I really didnt expect!

So basically I called the race right, the market disagreed with me, I bottled it and lost money. I'm definitely leaving Cheltenham to the big boys now.
I learnt from my gambling days, the market doesn't often agree with you because everybody looks at a race from a different angle.
TBH Derek I felt the market was more manipulated away from me than actually disagreeing through logical movemengt. Basically Summerville Boy raced with Kalashnikov at Sandown in Heavy going on 6th Jan, and recorded a very fast time for heavy going with Summerville edgeing out Kalashnikov. Then the feat was repeated today on Heavy ground with a 1, 2. Sometimes it's not rocket science is it? I guess this is what Timeform had picked up on too.
User avatar
ruthlessimon
Posts: 2142
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm

Wolf1877 wrote:
Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:04 pm
TBH Derek I felt the market was more manipulated

Sometimes it's not rocket science is it?
Why have a stoploss on an intrinsically based position? - (assuming nothing fundamentally changed with the horse), seems silly imo
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 25157
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am

It's much harder to manipulate big markets like these because of the sheer amount of money in them, but there are just so many angles of looking at a race. As SHR posted, the Racing Post went for Getabird and a lot of people would have been on the front two.
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 26221
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm

Generally happy with this start, I think the markets are behaving themselves within expected bounds so far.
User avatar
ShaunWhite
Posts: 10358
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am

Euler wrote:
Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:24 pm
Generally happy with this start
Shhhh. I don't believe in fate but don't tempt it just in case.
User avatar
Dallas
Posts: 23484
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:57 pm

Euler wrote:
Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:24 pm
Generally happy with this start, I think the markets are behaving themselves within expected bounds so far.
Y, I started extra cautious this year given last years markets and markets in general of recent months
Wolf1877
Posts: 369
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 10:59 am

ruthlessimon wrote:
Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:20 pm
Wolf1877 wrote:
Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:04 pm
TBH Derek I felt the market was more manipulated

Sometimes it's not rocket science is it?
Why have a stoploss on an intrinsically based position? - (assuming nothing fundamentally changed with the horse), seems silly imo
I didnt have a stop loss RS, I manually traded out. I expected the Sommerville to gradually shorten when I backed it and was caught off guard by just how quickly it drifted from 9.8 out to about 15 just before the off. I wasnt planning to gamble on Sommerville in a field of 20 but my automated fundamental analysis just boosted my confidence (incorrectly it turned out) that the horse was unlikely to significantly drift in a market I expected to be as well studied as Cheltenham. Basically I've not traded Cheltenham or a large meeting before and I was unprepared for the sudden volatility. If I'd been trading an Irish market I would have been expecting it and far more on my toes and traded out quicker. As I've said Cheltenham is definitely not for me this year and from this point forth with be purely observational.
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 25157
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am

Euler wrote:
Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:24 pm
Generally happy with this start, I think the markets are behaving themselves within expected bounds so far.
Coo Star Sivola.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
ruthlessimon
Posts: 2142
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm

Wolf1877 wrote:
Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:48 pm
I was caught off guard by just how quickly it drifted from 9.8 out to about 15 just before the off.

I wasnt planning to gamble on Sommerville in a field of 20 but my automated fundamental analysis just boosted my confidence
See imo what you've just done is demonstrate why it's wrong to blame manipulation.

Your entry was based on fundamentals, but your exit on technicals :?

15 to a pure fundamentalist would've been an amazing price, no matter how it got there (if nothing changes with the horse)
dragontrades
Posts: 1248
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:22 pm

Faugheen looks interesting here
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 25157
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am

Place markets are trading okay if you want to avoid the congestion of win markets.
Post Reply

Return to “Trading Horse racing”