

Derek27 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 6:46 pmWith all due respect Luca, you cannot say something won't work when you've never used it. Bet Angel and other trading software are not designed to make money - they are tools that traders use to trade. Ultimately it depends on the skill of the trader.Lucacrebbe wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:44 pmIt will never work (otherwise everyone would have been rich just using this kind of software, lol)
I think it fails because it's too semplicistic in the way to calculate the real odd and risk/reward
No robot will ever beat a potential brain
'''Your brain is like a quantum computer'' (quote from an successful investitors, I don't remember the name)
It would be better to programmate your own software... but it would never be the same as you to use your (potencial) brain before open a trade
Basically I don't trust any robot of this kind, cause AI it's on its infancy
Only when Quantum computers will start to appear there will be a good way to predict financial markets, or sports events.
For now human brain is the bst quantum computer you have.
I am not saying statistics are trash... they are useful, but you don't need to relay only on statistics, or you will lose
That being said, yes baking 1000$ has been an hazard... you are right, maybe staking 300$ would have been the right choise.
Let's be honest - you were unable to work out your loss for a trade opened at 21 and closed at 55. I can assure you it doesn't take a quantum computer to work it out, but a calculator can.
You did suggest statistics are trash and it was us that told you that you will lose if you rely purely on statistics!
I think $300 may be hazardous as well - how about minimum $2 stakes?
Come to the UK. (everyone else does).Lucacrebbe wrote: ↑Thu Mar 22, 2018 8:49 pm
I am going to live in Germany (not because of Betfair).
Will be able to bet on Betfair.com from there?
Some people are proud of the British Empire, some are ashamed of it!ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 8:50 pmI don't get the slogan. Is that something we should be proud of or ashamed of?
This is by far the funniest thread I have ever seen on any forum.
That's relying on statistics, but less than two hours later...Lucacrebbe wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 3:47 pmyes maybe are a little bit delayed, but I 'd have baked Pavliucenko at 21 anyway, because looking at the previous match, she had won 3 matches to 1, so statistically that odd was overpriced.
That's it. And too much overpriced, also.
You learn fast Luca.Lucacrebbe wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:44 pm... but you don't need to relay only on statistics, or you will lose
I can see what you don't get. It's "day's".ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 8:50 pmI don't get the slogan. Is that something we should be proud of or ashamed of?
I just missed her.wearthefoxhat wrote: ↑Sat Mar 24, 2018 4:58 pm
In that case; Angelique Kerber is quoted at 12/1 with Bet365....
Luca, did you not read Phrenetic's post above?phrenetic wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 9:48 am@Lucacrebbe
As you cannot log in to betfair.com, the odds that you are seeing are NOT representative of the current market conditions. When you are not logged in, the odds that are displayed on the screen are DELAYED odds.
Here is an example screenshot - betfair.com (not logged in) on the left, BA on the right. This is a single screenshot, with both browser and BA on my screen at the same time (i.e. the pictures show the exact same moment in time)
tennis_delayed.png
I have simulated a trade logged in betfair.itDerek27 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 26, 2018 11:45 pmLuca, did you not read Phrenetic's post above?
You can't paper trade delayed odds because those odds don't exist, so your results are meaningless.
You would be better off just trading the betfair.it site to smaller stakes and seeing if you can make a profit.
I've made a good profit in practice mode on the tennis (don't normally trade tennis) but I'm not getting excited until I use real money.