
* Please post actual post text (or at least give it a brief)
Edit: Actually it may have been this follow-up post exampling a trading opportunity that I was thinking of.Dallas wrote: ↑Sat Mar 24, 2018 1:51 pmThe only people backing in that situation will of been gamblers/punters, it was not a 'Trading Opportunity' just about every serious or successful trader will of been looking at laying onlyLucacrebbe wrote: ↑Sat Mar 24, 2018 5:47 am
At the end of the first set Wozniaki was priced at 1,05
The first set ended 6-0
So I went all in in Wozniaki (1000$ at 1.05 price)
Wozniaky lost the second set , and then the match.
What has been my error?
You risked $1000 to win $50 but only if she won the 2nd set
If you layed her at 1.06 (for the same $1000 risk) even if she stumbled or faced a break point her odds would of drifted a few ticks, if they drifted to just 1.09 which was hightly likely if facing a break point you could of traded out and made $450 (9 times the amount just through facing a break of serve) perhaps as early as the 1st game of the 2nd set!
Had she lost the 2nd set her odds will of gone out to around 1.35, which would of given you around $3600 profit (72 times that $50 amount you were hoping to win by backing her @ 1.05)
So ask your self in this situation if the match was played out 72 times would Wozniacki of won the 2nd set all 72 times?
Trading tennis is about finding those Risk Vs Reward situations and putting yourself on the right side of them
Have a look at the today's tennis thread and a few of the past grand slam threads, there are tons of graphs which show the wild price swings you get from a tennis match, rarely will a price just trade straight down to 1.01 from its starting price.
haha, some high quality trolling there!
good idea, ill request for that in original postShaunWhite wrote: ↑Tue Apr 17, 2018 5:59 pmPotentially a good thread, I hope it stays tidy (any chance of posting the actual texts rather than links?)
lol, just pullin' ya leg. sounds like a great idea and could definitely spawn a life of its own..sa7med wrote: ↑Tue Apr 17, 2018 5:55 pmhaha, some high quality trolling there!
different schools are fine, but I believe you now owe us a post within a postxitian wrote: ↑Tue Apr 17, 2018 6:24 pmI'd disagree about that. I've used backtesting a lot. When used correctly it's very powerful and I'd say almost essential (at least for what I do).
BetAngel has no backtesting facility probably because of Peter's view, which is a shame I think. I suppose it's also partly because of data licensing issues. But I'm surprised BetAngel wouldn't be allow to have a facility to store market data for an individual's personal use. BetAngel as a business obviously can't sell or publish the data itself, but collecting data for personal use must be different. Anyone who has access to the API can store data, so why not individual BetAngel users?
+1
It's mainly due to data license and compliance issues. IP is a tetchy area for those who have it.xitian wrote: ↑Tue Apr 17, 2018 6:24 pmI'd disagree about that. I've used backtesting a lot. When used correctly it's very powerful and I'd say almost essential (at least for what I do).
BetAngel has no backtesting facility probably because of Peter's view, which is a shame I think. I suppose it's also partly because of data licensing issues. But I'm surprised BetAngel wouldn't be allow to have a facility to store market data for an individual's personal use. BetAngel as a business obviously can't sell or publish the data itself, but collecting data for personal use must be different. Anyone who has access to the API can store data, so why not individual BetAngel users?