

Thanks in advance!
It would actually result in HMRC making a loss due to the bookmaker spreads / exchange commission.spreadbetting wrote: ↑Wed Apr 25, 2018 4:04 pmGambling winnings aren't taxable in the UK because if something can be taxed you can generally also claim rebates of overpaid tax too. For HMRC it's a can of worms so for the small amounts they'd likely make it's just not worth the hassle. Other countries treat it differently though so depends where you're based.
Totally agree Shaun. I was in the tax industry before retiring. I wouldn't be surprised if HMRC didn't carry out a full review of betting taxes sometime, it's full of anomalies carried over from the days of shop bookmaking and earlier. If you enter a shares trade as a Contact for Differences (CforD)the profit is CGT taxable (for anyone who has not come across these instruments before it's an investment where the return is based on the difference in price of a share without the requirement for you to invest the full value of the shares, you just need to cover the liability) but if you do what is effectively a CforD with a spreadbet company there is no tax because it's betting ... it makes no sense!ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 12:14 amThat's right. Pro gambling used to be a very niche activity that didn't warrent the complications and paperwork. It was also a cash activity not easily tracked.
As it becomes more common, loopholes get closed, and it gets easier for hmrc to track your account activities, it's a situation I wouldn't guarantee will exist forever.
People often say that they won't because losses would be deductable, but they're only a deduction, not a refund.
Derek ...Derek27 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 9:37 amThe UK government considered taxing betting profits several years ago but decided to focus on the betting operators instead. I don't know the exact reasons but as far as I can see there are three things that make taxing gamblers difficult.
- Gambling is perceived to be highly risky so there will be uncertainty what tax rebate they'll have to pay
- Quite difficult to define a professional gambler
- Too easy to place hidden cash bets/arbs to hide profits
All taxable "trading" involves buying and selling "real property" eg fish, shares, money etc. - ownership of tangible goods or entitlement to services are exchanged between the parties - even if only for a few microseconds.
On sports exchanges there is no such thing as "trading" either technically or legally - it is all peer-to-peer betting (mutual wagers on the outcome of an event) facilitated by the exchange and does not figure as something offered in the T&C's of any exchange as far as I know.
Here, "trading" actually consists of multiple bets on win/lose and even then there is a gamble as to whether you can match any or all of your "bets" or not. It just happens to be a low risk form of gambling - which many manage to make high risk and wipe themselves out !
Tax precedent for ignoring gambling dates back to 1925 - see https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manual ... l/bim22017
However, if you are a volume layer making offers then you could be considered as making a book even if just offering on one runner - potential for tax may arise in that case since you are acting as a bookie.
LeTiss you have also taken bookies, gamblers etc ... I agree but I was specifically referring to Traders ... no bookies just Betfair and Betdaq. And even if they go overseas you can still regulate them in their UK activity. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regulate all investment funds that operate in the UK regardless where they are based. If a Cayman based Investment house wants to market it's products in the UK it has to agree to abide by UK regulations. Add to that the money laudering regulations and it will be very difficult to hide accounts.LeTiss wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 9:54 amIt would still be difficult to administer though.
Many bookies would say they cannot show people's P&L to HMRC for data protection reasons.
They will also be wanting to protect themselves, as it highlight their tactics of closing some people's accounts after only winning £200, whilst others get sucked dry until they are bankrupt and homeless. I don't think bookies would welcome that intrusion.
Some people will bet with many different bookies and exchanges. They will offload bets, and maybe do business with companies outside of UK jurisdiction, especially bwin, or others who have relocated to the Channel Islands where they have different taxation systems
The plus side however, is BF would be forced to review their Premium Charge, as they would never keep successful punters/traders - either that, or the exchanges would end
Yes and so was the tax precedent on relief for life assurance premiums, the tax precedent on pension schemes, the tax precedent on principle residence mortgage interest relief ... taxbooks are full of tax precedents that are no more. Why? Because the law was changed. It matters not a jot what the law said 90 years ago, what matters is what the law says tomorrow. They make the law so they can change the law.the tax precedent is legally clear for betting and has been for over 90 years
Not at all, with modern technology it would be easy. A law could be passed instructing Betfair and Betdaq to supply the data, the tax law could be changed in the next budget and an A-level coder student could write the code required to marry the data and find the activity (I could even do it!