Here is a really interesting piece in the Harvard business review : -
https://hbr.org/2018/07/if-you-say-some ... hink-it-is
The next time you find yourself stating that a deal or other business outcome is “unlikely” or, alternatively, is “virtually certain,” stop yourself and ask: What percentage chance, in what time period, would I put on this outcome? Frame your prediction that way, and it’ll be clear to both yourself and others where you truly stand.
If You Say Something Is “Likely,” How Likely Do People Think It Is?
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
That's pretty much the message that's in the much lauded but equally derided TitZ.
Assess your confidence and then assess your confidence in that judgement. The danger is the analysis paralysis caused by the potential vicious circle.
'potential vicious circle' ?
There's 40% chance of that I think, and I say that with 65% confidence; but I'm only 75% certain that the 65% confidence in my initial 40% estimate is right, but I am 95% certain about that.
Assess your confidence and then assess your confidence in that judgement. The danger is the analysis paralysis caused by the potential vicious circle.
'potential vicious circle' ?
There's 40% chance of that I think, and I say that with 65% confidence; but I'm only 75% certain that the 65% confidence in my initial 40% estimate is right, but I am 95% certain about that.
... taxi for White!!ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Mon Jul 09, 2018 2:21 pmThat's pretty much the message that's in the much lauded but equally derided TitZ.
Assess your confidence and then assess your confidence in that judgement. The danger is the analysis paralysis caused by the potential vicious circle.
'potential vicious circle' ?
There's 40% chance of that I think, and I say that with 65% confidence; but I'm only 75% certain that the 65% confidence in my initial 40% estimate is right, but I am 95% certain about that.
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
- ruthlessimon
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm
K Peter, no more "I think it's more likely to steam/drift" in your videos, I want % likelihoods of moves occurring in the given timeframes
- ruthlessimon
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm
This might be slightly off topic, but I think it does have links in the OP.ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Mon Jul 09, 2018 2:21 pmAssess your confidence and then assess your confidence in that judgement. The danger is the analysis paralysis caused by the potential vicious circle.
'potential vicious circle' ?
There's 40% chance of that I think, and I say that with 65% confidence; but I'm only 75% certain that the 65% confidence in my initial 40% estimate is right, but I am 95% certain about that.
Let's assume we've "averaged" the likelihood of the volatility in a Handicap race (within a given time) - i.e. "The average range in this race is 17ticks" (i.e. an objective piece of info). I've always had problems with a statistic like that, because most of the time the race won't have a range of 17ticks! Not only that but the most interesting races have been smeared into that 17tick tick figure. Something might have gone 100ticks - arguably that should be the focal race of the data.
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
Yep I'd keep that out of the vids, especially when some think it's all guesswork and most others are undeserving.
But anytime you want to do a bonus 'Director's Cut' with voice over for subscribers......
- ruthlessimon
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm
Add me to that list except I'd also want stops & targets mentioned along with the probabilities in the directors cutShaunWhite wrote: ↑Mon Jul 09, 2018 7:00 pmBut anytime you want to do a bonus 'Director's Cut' with voice over for subscribers......
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
Greedy boy. But not surprising from Mr Greed-is-good.
I guess some dogs beg for scraps and others will clean the plate when you're not looking.
I guess some dogs beg for scraps and others will clean the plate when you're not looking.
-
- Posts: 863
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2015 6:47 pm
I'd very much doubt any of us could always, for every action/choice during trading, give a specific % of probabilities. Perhaps at times yes, but in the heat of trading battle with possibly multiple rapid decisions and actions, I'd doubt it - surely a lot of decisions have to be made more 'Gestalt' kind of way, where we get the feel that the decision is more or less likely to be right?
-
- Posts: 863
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2015 6:47 pm
Course, I'm only meaning manual trading here (automation I presume will always be working on specific numbers).