ruthlessimon wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 5:52 pm
jamesg46 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 5:28 pm
I suggested it as a good place to start because of 'ask what, not why'
Yah, that what to why bit was kinda interesting - the problem is, stuff like that tends to reaffirm my own opinions
- & that's why I queried
For example for me, recency bias is solved, not through "delib. practice", but by starting some form of data collection asap - gives us a better chance of seeing the longterm facts, imho. Unfortunately for me, I basically started 2yrs late - hence why I bash it quite heavy, because it was/is so vital for me. Obviously everyones different, but for me it was such a huge help.
Actually that vid did allow me to find this old thread (
viewtopic.php?f=36&t=8807), interestingly the "why's" outnumber the "what's" - so according to Tasha, that's bad advice Peter
'Well hasn't this thread turned out to be very interesting all of the sudden...
For example for me, recency bias is solved, not through "delib. practice", but by starting some form of data collection asap - gives us a better chance of seeing the longterm facts, imho. Unfortunately for me, I basically started 2yrs late - hence why I bash it quite heavy, because it was/is so vital for me. Obviously everyones different, but for me it was such a huge help' + me, although I think I'm around three years too late, not that it's ever too late to start (or is it)
Anyway, the thread imo is all still very relevant just the one word, is it why or is it what. For me, it's what... but that's my belief system & I think it's down to each individual to make that decision. Great post & thank you for directing me to the thread!