Coronavirus - A pale horse,4 men and ....beer
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
Tbf I thought they'd buy bottled water before bog roll, seems like they're doomsday preppingwearthefoxhat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 19, 2020 4:20 amI bought a water filter jug a while ago, so there's no reason at all not to use tap water!
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 10399
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am

I'm going full-on Mad Max if things get sticky out there. Pity none of them do more than about 4 miles per litre

- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
Nah, next stage will be throwing stuff out because they have had it for 5 days so it must be going off!



What's pissing me off is my little town of 10,000 was doing just fine, no queues, no signs of panic buying, shelves just a little down. Then last weekend I caught a report on one of the news channels that while cities and large towns were running out 'outlying' towns were coping well. Now suddenly we have empty shelves and 07:00 queues waiting for supermarkets to open. Coincidence or are we being invaded by outsiders?
- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
Now that is funnysuperfrank wrote: ↑Wed Mar 18, 2020 7:48 pm...a White House official called it “kung-flu” in front of a Chinese-American journalist.




- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
Been thinking this for a while now ... there is a chance more may die from the fallout of the effects of the 'big spend' than from the virus itself!marketraisen wrote: ↑Thu Mar 19, 2020 12:54 amWhats been sacrificed economically and whats been borrowed against future tax revenues is utterly insane, scarier still is how quickly the population at large has bought into the panic wholesale.
Lack of exercise, sunlight, stress and unemployment will definitely damage our healthfirlandsfarm wrote: ↑Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:44 amBeen thinking this for a while now ... there is a chance more may die from the fallout of the effects of the 'big spend' than from the virus itself!marketraisen wrote: ↑Thu Mar 19, 2020 12:54 amWhats been sacrificed economically and whats been borrowed against future tax revenues is utterly insane, scarier still is how quickly the population at large has bought into the panic wholesale.
-
- Posts: 4478
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
Having spoken to some Army buddies it seems that the UK will go into complete lock down within the next 72 hours.
- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
I've been in lockdown isolation since I retired 20 years ago! 

-
- Posts: 4478
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Thu Mar 19, 2020 9:49 amI've been in lockdown isolation since I retired 20 years ago!![]()






- superfrank
- Posts: 2762
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:28 pm
The government changed tack when the data indicated they'd be hundreds of thousands of deaths and a completely overwhelmed health service if it didn't.Naffman wrote: ↑Thu Mar 19, 2020 7:33 amLack of exercise, sunlight, stress and unemployment will definitely damage our healthfirlandsfarm wrote: ↑Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:44 amBeen thinking this for a while now ... there is a chance more may die from the fallout of the effects of the 'big spend' than from the virus itself!marketraisen wrote: ↑Thu Mar 19, 2020 12:54 amWhats been sacrificed economically and whats been borrowed against future tax revenues is utterly insane, scarier still is how quickly the population at large has bought into the panic wholesale.
Other countries, including the more libertarian USA, have reached a similar conclusion.
One could argue that we might have been "better off" letting things run their course, but in this day and age (when people sue and are arrested about the misuse of gender pronouns) it would have been politically impossible anyway.
that's what THEY said - lolsuperfrank wrote: ↑Thu Mar 19, 2020 9:54 amOne could argue that we might have been "better off" letting things run their course, but in this day and age (when people sue and are arrested about the misuse of gender pronouns) it would have been politically impossible anyway.
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2018 3:41 am
I genuinely think the government changing its approach is down to them reassessing just how hysterical and anxious the public are rather than any medical reassessment, the people are crying out to be locked in their homes and they wont be satisfied until its at gunpoint.superfrank wrote: ↑Thu Mar 19, 2020 9:54 amOne could argue that we might have been "better off" letting things run their course, but in this day and age (when people sue and are arrested about the misuse of gender pronouns) it would have been politically impossible anyway.