Not if two people can organise it, or five from the same household.

Not if two people can organise it, or five from the same household.
superfrank wrote: ↑Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:03 pmWhy the Coronavirus Has Been So Successful
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/arc ... us/608338/Thats something that leapt into my head a few days ago. Evolution you'd think will sustain the virus, it's already done a great job of emerging and surviving.Since the start of the pandemic, the virus hasn’t changed in any obviously important ways. It’s mutating in the way that all viruses do. But of the 100-plus mutations that have been documented, none has risen to dominance, which suggests that none is especially important. “The virus has been remarkably stable given how much transmission we’ve seen,” says Lisa Gralinski of the University of North Carolina. “That makes sense, because there’s no evolutionary pressure on the virus to transmit better. It’s doing a great job of spreading around the world right now.”[/quote]
But being enough of a threat to mobilise humanity against you.
Thats a baaaad idea!!
Are the number of people dying from covid-19 increasing at an exponential scale? You might want to inform the WHO organisation of your findings.
I'm at a loss as to the reasoning for now, though we will find out in time, technically I guess you could say its conspiratorial for me or anyone to suggest something has been done for malevolent reasons but then whether or not thats a negative thought process depends on your own interpretation of the word. Personally all the normal connotations 'conspiracy' conjures doesnt put me off questioning things ie somebody saying 'well if you believe X then obviously you must believe Y and therefore X is discredited'.ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Mon Mar 23, 2020 9:47 pmYou said the reaction was unnecessary. If you're right that means those doing it either have something to gain or have been deceived by people that have something to gain.
What planet are you living on marketraisen?marketraisen wrote: ↑Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:43 pmAre the number of people dying from covid-19 increasing at an exponential scale? You might want to inform the WHO organisation of your findings.
Check the chart at the top of this page. It certainly isn't increasing in a linear fashion:marketraisen wrote: ↑Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:43 pmAre the number of people dying from covid-19 increasing at an exponential scale? You might want to inform the WHO organisation of your findings.
It was always going to be exponential. Viruses or even the spread of gossip are exponential funtions. And because of that, altering the transmission rate has a massive possitive (or negative) affect on future outcome. This is aincient maths so not up for dispute, it was the basis of the calculation of how many messengers each Roman messenger needed to pass news onto, to get information across the Empire in a reasonable time. Having your own opinions is fine, but if you've got your own maths you either need a Nobel prize or a maths lesson.Ethanol wrote: ↑Mon Mar 23, 2020 11:48 pmCheck the chart at the top of this page. It certainly isn't increasing in a linear fashion:marketraisen wrote: ↑Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:43 pmAre the number of people dying from covid-19 increasing at an exponential scale? You might want to inform the WHO organisation of your findings.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavir ... eath-toll/
Also, look at the same "Total Deaths" chart (orange) for Italy and the UK.