Do most of the racing on Wed + Sat but will wake about 4-5am if I work the other days
Australian racing
Amazing how poor they are at communicating thissa7med wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 7:30 amplanned maintenance, although was supposed to start at 7:40
https://forum.developer.betfair.com/for ... -08-40-bst
To be fair to them - I got an sms this morning about the outage - so a decent heads up.Naffman wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 7:36 amAmazing how poor they are at communicating thissa7med wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 7:30 amplanned maintenance, although was supposed to start at 7:40
https://forum.developer.betfair.com/for ... -08-40-bst
I've noticed BF Aus care about their customers (not that much though that they still charge PC) a lot more than the UK side who believe we all rise at 10amgazuty wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 1:15 pmTo be fair to them - I got an sms this morning about the outage - so a decent heads up.Naffman wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 7:36 amAmazing how poor they are at communicating thissa7med wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 7:30 am
planned maintenance, although was supposed to start at 7:40
https://forum.developer.betfair.com/for ... -08-40-bst
think with backing 1000 most of the time you get matched on all of them but 1 so for 11 runners its basically the same odds as laying 1.01.
Not made statistical analysis but going by amounts queued at 1.01 compared to usually nothing at 1000 youd think generally laying 1.01 is better value if you could get first in queue.
if its a competitive finish with multiple runners i think putting back bets at much higher odds than currently traded can work as a strategy as cross matching can get you matched easily if there is betting on at least 2 others.
I’ve done the experiment. Went for a reasonable period - maybe four months or so - layed every runner in every Australian race at 1.01. It didn’t turn out positive - maybe I didn’t go for long enough, sometimes I was first in the queue, sometimes I wasn’t, some days I got three 1.01 turnovers (maybe I should have martingaled itrik wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 8:45 amthink with backing 1000 most of the time you get matched on all of them but 1 so for 11 runners its basically the same odds as laying 1.01.
Not made statistical analysis but going by amounts queued at 1.01 compared to usually nothing at 1000 youd think generally laying 1.01 is better value if you could get first in queue.
if its a competitive finish with multiple runners i think putting back bets at much higher odds than currently traded can work as a strategy as cross matching can get you matched easily if there is betting on at least 2 others.
I did find other numbers below 2 that work, but since I’ve paid my learning fee to the market I’ll keep that for me.
Last edited by gazuty on Fri Jun 26, 2020 9:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
rik wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 8:45 amthink with backing 1000 most of the time you get matched on all of them but 1 so for 11 runners its basically the same odds as laying 1.01.
Not made statistical analysis but going by amounts queued at 1.01 compared to usually nothing at 1000 youd think generally laying 1.01 is better value if you could get first in queue.
if its a competitive finish with multiple runners i think putting back bets at much higher odds than currently traded can work as a strategy as cross matching can get you matched easily if there is betting on at least 2 others.
Interesting points.
I never think about cross-matching. I may need to force it into my brain somehow..
didnt watch the Moruya race, was it just beaten for a moment in the home stretch or came from well behind?Anbell wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 9:06 amrik wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 8:45 amthink with backing 1000 most of the time you get matched on all of them but 1 so for 11 runners its basically the same odds as laying 1.01.
Not made statistical analysis but going by amounts queued at 1.01 compared to usually nothing at 1000 youd think generally laying 1.01 is better value if you could get first in queue.
if its a competitive finish with multiple runners i think putting back bets at much higher odds than currently traded can work as a strategy as cross matching can get you matched easily if there is betting on at least 2 others.
Interesting points.
I never think about cross-matching. I may need to force it into my brain somehow..
-
- Posts: 1615
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am
This is the in in play min matched price for UK losers going back to 2015 - some notable features in the distribution...gazuty wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 9:02 amI’ve done the experiment. Went for a reasonable period - maybe four months or so - layed every runner in every Australian race at 1.01. It didn’t turn out positive - maybe I didn’t go for long enough, sometimes I was first in the queue, sometimes I wasn’t, some days I got three 1.01 turnovers (maybe I should have martingaled itrik wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 8:45 amthink with backing 1000 most of the time you get matched on all of them but 1 so for 11 runners its basically the same odds as laying 1.01.
Not made statistical analysis but going by amounts queued at 1.01 compared to usually nothing at 1000 youd think generally laying 1.01 is better value if you could get first in queue.
if its a competitive finish with multiple runners i think putting back bets at much higher odds than currently traded can work as a strategy as cross matching can get you matched easily if there is betting on at least 2 others.) many days I didn’t get any.
I did find other numbers below 2 that work, but since I’ve paid my learning fee to the market I’ll keep that for me.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.