Been looking over some results and just wondered if anyone can identify whether these courses groupings have anything in common. Happy to share findings with anyone that can help.
(there might be nothing in common and its random pattern - data covers c12,000 UK races & 20,000 AUS races)
UK
Ayr, Fake, FfosL, Ling, Newc, Sthl, Wolv
UK
Bev, Catt, Chep, Donc, Good, Sand, Taun, Thisrk, Uttox, York
AUS
Carn, Cess, Coff, Gawl, KemG, Morp, Sand, Tamw, Wang
AUS
Cran, Graf, Hshm, Pakn, Rand, Rose, Wagg, Well, WFrm
Courses (help)
The first list is predominantly tight tracks (with the exception of Ayr). The second list is more testing or galloping tracks with more demand for stamina (Uttoxeter and Thirsk notable exceptions). Don't know anything about Aussie courses.sionascaig wrote: ↑Mon Oct 12, 2020 1:08 pmBeen looking over some results and just wondered if anyone can identify whether these courses groupings have anything in common. Happy to share findings with anyone that can help.
(there might be nothing in common and its random pattern - data covers c12,000 UK races & 20,000 AUS races)
UK
Ayr, Fake, FfosL, Ling, Newc, Sthl, Wolv
UK
Bev, Catt, Chep, Donc, Good, Sand, Taun, Thisrk, Uttox, York
AUS
Carn, Cess, Coff, Gawl, KemG, Morp, Sand, Tamw, Wang
AUS
Cran, Graf, Hshm, Pakn, Rand, Rose, Wagg, Well, WFrm
-
sionascaig
- Posts: 1639
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am
Now if there were similar reasons on the AUS tracks that would be something )
(will send you a PM in a few weemac)
(will send you a PM in a few weemac)