What contrary trade can you run in parallel to prove or disprove your current strategy? Could you do the same trade in a different in-play market. Or a loosing trade strategy in this market to see if you get more greens, or any other A/B tests you can think of... Please share if you do?
CURRENTLY DONATING 20-60% OF MY DAILY TOTAL THROUGH LOSS AVERSION
I'm a complete novice and my experience over these first few months certainly bears out some of the comments you've received. My 'edge' as a novice is I recently watched a lot of Peters videos.. One in particular comes to mind where Peter talks about testing strategy hopthesis out. A/B Testing. To prove you're current conclusion set up conrary trades to prove or disprove the conclusion. One thing that draws me to trading is analysing my own activity, approach, choices visavee results. I truely don't know my own attitudes to risk related situations but I am already finding Trading is proving an insightful mirror and self-teacher. One self-discovery is, I recognise a valuable lesson (e.g. I trade an event on betfair I can't watch and inevitably have a loss) and then I seem to have to repeat that mistake several times before I really understand what it means as a trader to 'not-trade' an event. I'm starting to set myself minimums. Standards I will do go below. And the flip side is I trade positively more often when I watch the event I'm trading compared to trading negatively more often when I don't watch the event.
What contrary trade can you run in parallel to prove or disprove your current strategy? Could you do the same trade in a different in-play market. Or a loosing trade strategy in this market to see if you get more greens, or any other A/B tests you can think of... Please share if you do?

What contrary trade can you run in parallel to prove or disprove your current strategy? Could you do the same trade in a different in-play market. Or a loosing trade strategy in this market to see if you get more greens, or any other A/B tests you can think of... Please share if you do?
I believe it relates to being in the stage between conscious competence and unconscious competence.
What I noticed is that when everything is fine, I'm scanning the market and making lots of mini assessments and decisions, which have a subtle, but significant impact on my entries.
After a big loss, I stop doing this, I start focusing on making money, staring at my bets without thinking, losing awareness of the market.
What has helped is to make my rules and processes more explicit (since I never defined most of them) and in these moments follow them even more rigidly. I'm still less effective, but more importantly, I don't make so many losses from poor entries.
When I'm in the zone, I can be flexible and still pull it off, because I have enough awareness. When I'm not, pushing the boundaries always ends in a loss.
What I noticed is that when everything is fine, I'm scanning the market and making lots of mini assessments and decisions, which have a subtle, but significant impact on my entries.
After a big loss, I stop doing this, I start focusing on making money, staring at my bets without thinking, losing awareness of the market.
What has helped is to make my rules and processes more explicit (since I never defined most of them) and in these moments follow them even more rigidly. I'm still less effective, but more importantly, I don't make so many losses from poor entries.
When I'm in the zone, I can be flexible and still pull it off, because I have enough awareness. When I'm not, pushing the boundaries always ends in a loss.
