https://www.bitchute.com/video/ERPPXQ0a3kzi
Interesting video. Probably not 100% on some of the more farfetched topics, but in my opinion a lot of it makes more sense than the mainstream media. All I see from them are manipulated statistics, propaganda and censoring/complete refusal to discuss the other 50% of scientists research or the fact that no countries have saw any unusually high death totals regardless of which restrictions were adopted.
Emotional thinking vs logical thinking always reminds me of the psychology threads on this very forum.
The false "saving lives" narrative obviously stems from emotional thinking, but does it make any logical sense? Do those running things really want an exponentially increasing aging population, people living to 120 (sorry to be blunt) a bigger drain on society and the NHS? Do they want their kids working more to pay more tax to look after all the immortal pensioners? Is everyone just ignoring the fact that only 388/xxmillion under 60s in the UK with no known health conditions died within 28 days of a positive test result, giving a survival rate of something like 99.993% but then again the tests are quite inaccurate according to many scientists. I say false because of the overwhelming evidence that lockdowns are causing more deaths from cancelled treatments, diagnosing, suicides etc.
I do think there's a lot to the saying "follow the money for the truth". Of course, most people are still so emotionally charged from Sage's behavioural psychologists social disapproval tactics by the saving lives narrative that none of this will be up for discussion because anyone who questions things is heartless
The only one not in control of his mind is you.