Well done Shaun. £2.5k is not to be sniffed at.
Especially as it was being made whilst you were curled up on your sofa watching countdown!
Interesting seeing your drawdowns and variance in action though. If that was me, I’d have been panicking by mid August , good to see that your bot had the discipline to keep grinding out its edge and not do anything stupid !
Trading What I see !?
GOAT - here's a simulator that might help
https://valuebettingblog.com/advanced-b ... alculator/
https://valuebettingblog.com/advanced-b ... alculator/
Thanks that's a helpful tool.Anbell wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:01 amGOAT - here's a simulator that might help
https://valuebettingblog.com/advanced-b ... alculator/
I'm a bit dubious of MC stuff, just by it's nature of having very little input it can't really tell you much. The thing it will tell you is the more bets you do the more confidence and smaller % drawdown you will achieve. So basically it tells you the more bets you do the more confident you will be, which is sort of obvious!
It doesn't tell you if you've fitted your strategy, which is my biggest issue. I try and avoid fitting by using multiple sample sets, typically about 1month's worth each. However, what I find is market behaviour or my fitting changes from month to month. Which might actually be the case with "seasonality"...
I doubt that seasonality is your issue.goat68 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 10:18 amThanks that's a helpful tool.Anbell wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:01 amGOAT - here's a simulator that might help
https://valuebettingblog.com/advanced-b ... alculator/
I'm a bit dubious of MC stuff, just by it's nature of having very little input it can't really tell you much. The thing it will tell you is the more bets you do the more confidence and smaller % drawdown you will achieve. So basically it tells you the more bets you do the more confident you will be, which is sort of obvious!
It doesn't tell you if you've fitted your strategy, which is my biggest issue. I try and avoid fitting by using multiple sample sets, typically about 1month's worth each. However, what I find is market behaviour or my fitting changes from month to month. Which might actually be the case with "seasonality"...
I've done an interesting test looking at my "hedge" bet value.
So I used a strategy i'm working on for AUS horses, and used hedging at post time. Applying the method across the broad selections, and then hedging showed a net loss, BUT my net on just the "hedge bets" was about £0.
Then applying filters on the signal to find a better edge, showed +EV on the "signal bets", but a significant loss on the "hedge bets" -£343.
However, I know that if I don't "hedge" the +EV "signal bets" end up with a net loss due to commission!
So I used a strategy i'm working on for AUS horses, and used hedging at post time. Applying the method across the broad selections, and then hedging showed a net loss, BUT my net on just the "hedge bets" was about £0.
Then applying filters on the signal to find a better edge, showed +EV on the "signal bets", but a significant loss on the "hedge bets" -£343.
However, I know that if I don't "hedge" the +EV "signal bets" end up with a net loss due to commission!
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 10530
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
Don't do month A then month B, randomising across it all.goat68 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 10:18 amThanks that's a helpful tool.Anbell wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:01 amGOAT - here's a simulator that might help
https://valuebettingblog.com/advanced-b ... alculator/
I'm a bit dubious of MC stuff, just by it's nature of having very little input it can't really tell you much. The thing it will tell you is the more bets you do the more confidence and smaller % drawdown you will achieve. So basically it tells you the more bets you do the more confident you will be, which is sort of obvious!
It doesn't tell you if you've fitted your strategy, which is my biggest issue. I try and avoid fitting by using multiple sample sets, typically about 1month's worth each. However, what I find is market behaviour or my fitting changes from month to month. Which might actually be the case with "seasonality"...
MC is only intended to show you the expected range of results, ie how likely is your outcome. If you're dubious perhaps you've misunderstood what its for.
A month of data in each set? You know that's not enough so why do it?
Struggling to find anything that works across 3 months on pre-horses just on plain calendars! don't have to worry about randomising yet!ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 3:34 pmDon't do month A then month B, randomising across it all.goat68 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 10:18 amThanks that's a helpful tool.Anbell wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:01 amGOAT - here's a simulator that might help
https://valuebettingblog.com/advanced-b ... alculator/
I'm a bit dubious of MC stuff, just by it's nature of having very little input it can't really tell you much. The thing it will tell you is the more bets you do the more confidence and smaller % drawdown you will achieve. So basically it tells you the more bets you do the more confident you will be, which is sort of obvious!
It doesn't tell you if you've fitted your strategy, which is my biggest issue. I try and avoid fitting by using multiple sample sets, typically about 1month's worth each. However, what I find is market behaviour or my fitting changes from month to month. Which might actually be the case with "seasonality"...
MC is only intended to show you the expected range of results, ie how likely is your outcome. If you're dubious perhaps you've misunderstood what its for.
A month of data in each set? You know that's not enough so why do it?
So there must be the answer to this somewhere on this forum... but for the purpose of this calculator what is the Yield formula for Lay bets? The above calulator uses the term "Volume"? So if I Lay £2 at 5.0, the "Volume" is £2 ? or is it the risk amount ie.£8 ?Anbell wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:01 amGOAT - here's a simulator that might help
https://valuebettingblog.com/advanced-b ... alculator/
- Realrocknrolla
- Posts: 1910
- Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2020 7:15 pm
So i've been working on my new horse bot, the last one got ditched as I believe it was not much better than random, that leaves just dogbot at the moment, which has recovered after the initial September blip and is back in profit for Sept again.
So thank you to @Anbell for the link to the Betting Calculator: https://valuebettingblog.com/advanced-b ... alculator/ and will help me better judge the backtest results.
I have now run a 3 month backtest on the new UKhorsebot, and plugged into the above calculator, having worked out how to adjust the "volume" for Lay bets (I simply convert them into as-if they were a Back bet, thus £2 Lay at 5.0, is a volume=£8 at odds 1.25).
And the result on the new bot is below, so was wondering what people's experience/view of a P-value of 11% is? a little high?:
So thank you to @Anbell for the link to the Betting Calculator: https://valuebettingblog.com/advanced-b ... alculator/ and will help me better judge the backtest results.
I have now run a 3 month backtest on the new UKhorsebot, and plugged into the above calculator, having worked out how to adjust the "volume" for Lay bets (I simply convert them into as-if they were a Back bet, thus £2 Lay at 5.0, is a volume=£8 at odds 1.25).
And the result on the new bot is below, so was wondering what people's experience/view of a P-value of 11% is? a little high?:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.