Australian Open 2022

Post Reply
User avatar
jimibt
Posts: 4195
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 6:42 pm

archiebaldy wrote:
Mon Jan 10, 2022 7:34 pm
It's a great day for freedom of choice. Good on Djokovic hes a fantastic man. Gone way up in my estimation, unlike most of the people on here of have gone way down.
tbh - i don't think it's as simple as freedom of choice. whilst i'm definitely all for that, there also has to be an element of utilitarianism . if you are freely roaming unmasked with a known positive diagnosis then it doesn't imho make you a fantastic man, it simply shows that your chosen way to exhibit your freedom of choice is selfish and immature.

hope you still like me :roll:
Trader Pat
Posts: 4327
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:50 pm

jimibt wrote:
Mon Jan 10, 2022 7:46 pm
archiebaldy wrote:
Mon Jan 10, 2022 7:34 pm
It's a great day for freedom of choice. Good on Djokovic hes a fantastic man. Gone way up in my estimation, unlike most of the people on here of have gone way down.
tbh - i don't think it's as simple as freedom of choice. whilst i'm definitely all for that, there also has to be an element of utilitarianism . if you are freely roaming unmasked with a known positive diagnosis then it doesn't imho make you a fantastic man, it simply shows that your chosen way to exhibit your freedom of choice is selfish and immature.
Exactly this.
Trader Pat
Posts: 4327
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:50 pm

greenmark wrote:
Mon Jan 10, 2022 7:32 pm
For me, I'm a reluctant Novak fan. 21 titles GOAT.
Don't be getting ahead of yourself :D

I fancy Medvedev to stop him especially with the lack of preparation etc.. but I wouldn't be shocked if Djokovic won it. Plus the added wildcard of players dropping out of the draw due to Covid could make for a very interesting tournament.

EDIT: The irony if Djokovic tests positive for Covid during the tournament!
User avatar
Kai
Posts: 7067
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:21 pm

jimibt wrote:
Mon Jan 10, 2022 7:46 pm
archiebaldy wrote:
Mon Jan 10, 2022 7:34 pm
It's a great day for freedom of choice. Good on Djokovic hes a fantastic man. Gone way up in my estimation, unlike most of the people on here of have gone way down.
tbh - i don't think it's as simple as freedom of choice. whilst i'm definitely all for that, there also has to be an element of utilitarianism . if you are freely roaming unmasked with a known positive diagnosis then it doesn't imho make you a fantastic man, it simply shows that your chosen way to exhibit your freedom of choice is selfish and immature.

hope you still like me :roll:
A'm a bawherr disappointed in ye as weel Jimbo, a man's freedom insae a laughing maiter
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 26322
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm

Trader Pat wrote:
Mon Jan 10, 2022 8:17 pm
jimibt wrote:
Mon Jan 10, 2022 7:46 pm
archiebaldy wrote:
Mon Jan 10, 2022 7:34 pm
It's a great day for freedom of choice. Good on Djokovic hes a fantastic man. Gone way up in my estimation, unlike most of the people on here of have gone way down.
tbh - i don't think it's as simple as freedom of choice. whilst i'm definitely all for that, there also has to be an element of utilitarianism . if you are freely roaming unmasked with a known positive diagnosis then it doesn't imho make you a fantastic man, it simply shows that your chosen way to exhibit your freedom of choice is selfish and immature.
Exactly this.
Ditto
User avatar
gazuty
Posts: 2554
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2011 11:03 am

The saga continues - Allegation in the AFR that Djokovic said he had been in Spain for the 14 days prior to entry into Australia. However, it is alleged in the AFR he has a social media post showing him in Serbia on 25 Dec. Separate to the Minister, Australian Border Force Officials are understood to be reviewing whether he had a false declaration (grounds for having visa cancelled).

Main draw scheduled to be drawn on Thursday 13 Jan. Surely the Government makes a final decision before then (in the interests of gambling - Australia's greatest past time).
henbet22
Posts: 494
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2017 4:28 pm

Yes it does look bleak for him now.
User avatar
archiebaldy
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2020 11:34 am

Euler wrote:
Mon Jan 10, 2022 11:13 pm
Trader Pat wrote:
Mon Jan 10, 2022 8:17 pm
jimibt wrote:
Mon Jan 10, 2022 7:46 pm


tbh - i don't think it's as simple as freedom of choice. whilst i'm definitely all for that, there also has to be an element of utilitarianism . if you are freely roaming unmasked with a known positive diagnosis then it doesn't imho make you a fantastic man, it simply shows that your chosen way to exhibit your freedom of choice is selfish and immature.
Exactly this.
Ditto
I make my money from gambling one way or another. Do you all know the destruction and harm this causes to other human beings. Young children going without food,homes being lost. If you can turn a blind eye to all this. But in the next breath moan about a bloke who doesn't want a vaccine. Good luck to you all karma don't discriminate. Exactly this ditto.

Glass houses and stones.
henbet22
Posts: 494
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2017 4:28 pm

Such a mess though. Whether he plays or not...... its a right mess. Pantomine villain number 1 right now and then some.
sionascaig
Posts: 1620
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am

Thought this was a bit bizarre:

"The travel declaration comes on top of reported anomalies on the official website showing Djokovic’s positive Covid test, which was the basis for his claimed medical exemption from vaccination. Der Spiegel reported that the QR code linked to Djokovic’s Covid-19 test on 16 December, published in court documents on Monday, at times appeared to return a negative result.

According to Der Spiegel, accessing Djokovic’s test result via QR code on Monday evening Australia time revealed a negative test result, before a subsequent attempt showed a positive result.

The website returned only positive results when accessed by the Guardian on Tuesday.

The New York Times reporter Ben Rothenberg similarly reported getting contradictory results from the same QR code."

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/ ... avel-claim
Anbell
Posts: 2381
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 2:31 am

[delete]
User avatar
jimibt
Posts: 4195
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 6:42 pm

archiebaldy wrote:
Tue Jan 11, 2022 7:11 am
Euler wrote:
Mon Jan 10, 2022 11:13 pm
Trader Pat wrote:
Mon Jan 10, 2022 8:17 pm


Exactly this.
Ditto
I make my money from gambling one way or another. Do you all know the destruction and harm this causes to other human beings. Young children going without food,homes being lost. If you can turn a blind eye to all this. But in the next breath moan about a bloke who doesn't want a vaccine.
Exactly. The gamble that this bloke is taking with folks health thro' being willfully ignorant and his arrogance to the needs of others does demonstrate your point very neatly.
Trader Pat
Posts: 4327
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:50 pm

archiebaldy wrote:
Tue Jan 11, 2022 7:11 am
Euler wrote:
Mon Jan 10, 2022 11:13 pm
Trader Pat wrote:
Mon Jan 10, 2022 8:17 pm


Exactly this.
Ditto
I make my money from gambling one way or another. Do you all know the destruction and harm this causes to other human beings. Young children going without food,homes being lost. If you can turn a blind eye to all this. But in the next breath moan about a bloke who doesn't want a vaccine. Good luck to you all karma don't discriminate. Exactly this ditto.

Glass houses and stones.

More than a bit of a stretch to compare the two.

The issue isn't that he's unvaxxed, it's that he potentially attended public events when he knew he was Covid positive. I think we've clearly made that point.

One of my best mates is unvaxxed and he has no intention of getting any jab but a few months ago he tested positive and had to self isolate. He did what he had to and stayed home, he didn't go out unmasked into crowded areas with no regard for anybody else just because he doesn't want to get vaccinated.
User avatar
jimibt
Posts: 4195
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 6:42 pm

Trader Pat wrote:
Tue Jan 11, 2022 12:27 pm
archiebaldy wrote:
Tue Jan 11, 2022 7:11 am
Euler wrote:
Mon Jan 10, 2022 11:13 pm


Ditto
I make my money from gambling one way or another. Do you all know the destruction and harm this causes to other human beings. Young children going without food,homes being lost. If you can turn a blind eye to all this. But in the next breath moan about a bloke who doesn't want a vaccine. Good luck to you all karma don't discriminate. Exactly this ditto.

Glass houses and stones.

More than a bit of a stretch to compare the two.

The issue isn't that he's unvaxxed, it's that he potentially attended public events when he knew he was Covid positive. I think we've clearly made that point.

One of my best mates is unvaxxed and he has no intention of getting any jab but a few months ago he tested positive and had to self isolate. He did what he had to and stayed home, he didn't go out unmasked into crowded areas with no regard for anybody else just because he doesn't want to get vaccinated.
as you'll have seen, the plot thickens on this one. both the guardian and a new york times journalist queried his covid pcr test online before the weekend and it showed up as being negative (which would make you think that's a great case for entering AUS). Roll fwd 2 days and the inquiry into his entry is in full swing and the same PCR result is now showing thta it was positive on the 16th DEC. Very convenient if you were looking for an exeption status clearance.

in short, some forensic digging will unearth the real story here. (maybe an antidody test would be the clincher!)
Trader Pat
Posts: 4327
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:50 pm

jimibt wrote:
Tue Jan 11, 2022 12:47 pm

as you'll have seen, the plot thickens on this one. both the guardian and a new york times journalist queried his covid pcr test online before the weekend and it showed up as being negative (which would make you think that's a great case for entering AUS). Roll fwd 2 days and the inquiry into his entry is in full swing and the same PCR result is now showing thta it was positive on the 16th DEC. Very convenient if you were looking for an exeption status clearance.

in short, some forensic digging will unearth the real story here. (maybe an antidody test would be the clincher!)

This is like anti-doping in reverse :D "Hello is this the lab? We need a positive test ASAP"

This saga raises more questions about medical exemptions in sport. They can be very controversial and if a person benefits from one then wins a major sporting event it leaves a question mark over their achievements.
Post Reply

Return to “Tennis Trading”