To place SP Bets 'by liability using Stored Value Stake'

Help improve Bet Angel.
Post Reply

Is it worth adding the option: To place SP Bets 'by liability using Stored Value Stake'

Poll ended at Wed Mar 09, 2022 8:59 am

Yes - I would find that helpful.
4
100%
No - I don't think it's required.
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 4
User avatar
lotora
Posts: 754
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:20 am

Since we don't know the price in advance, my suggestion would be to instead use a proxy, for example: the last mid price. (changed from Projected SP)
Last edited by lotora on Tue Mar 08, 2022 6:12 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
lotora
Posts: 754
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:20 am

Any opinions?
User avatar
ShaunWhite
Posts: 10455
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am

lotora wrote:
Mon Mar 07, 2022 8:59 am
Since we don't know the price in advance, my suggestion would be to instead use a proxy, for example: "Projected SP".
ProjSP isn't updated quickly enough, the best guess at SP is the last mid price. It's fairly common for people to keep checking the last mid price and adjusting (cancel & replace) the stake on any SP cover bet accordingly. Do apply a threshold to the change though otherwise you may exceed your hourly transaction limit.
User avatar
lotora
Posts: 754
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:20 am

ShaunWhite wrote:
Mon Mar 07, 2022 12:06 pm
lotora wrote:
Mon Mar 07, 2022 8:59 am
Since we don't know the price in advance, my suggestion would be to instead use a proxy, for example: "Projected SP".
ProjSP isn't updated quickly enough, the best guess at SP is the last mid price. It's fairly common for people to keep checking the last mid price and adjusting (cancel & replace) the stake on any SP cover bet accordingly. Do apply a threshold to the change though otherwise you may exceed your hourly transaction limit.
A great idea! Is now changed to the last mid price. Please vote IF you agree!
User avatar
lotora
Posts: 754
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:20 am

If not, do you have another suggestion?
User avatar
lotora
Posts: 754
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:20 am

It didn't get many votes, but I really hope it will be implemented anyway, because it's really beneficial for those of us who prefer 'Stake by liability using Stored Value Stake'. Then, we don't have to switch between countless pre-calculated stakes dependent on the odds (I use 41 different ones), and it's very easy to implement, right?
Post Reply

Return to “Suggestions”