Just imagine the UK calling up conscripts and putting me on the frontline, with a rifle and a few cans of beer.
Ukraine Crisis
-
eatyourgreens
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:53 am
Back on topic, I have just watched a video on you tube, an interviewer is stopping Russian citizens in the street and asking them if they have seen what has happened in Bucha.
One Russian woman said "its fake, its totally fake, all the bodies are laying in unnatural positions, they wouldn't normally lay like that"
FFS.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj23VHjAS5g 4:30
One Russian woman said "its fake, its totally fake, all the bodies are laying in unnatural positions, they wouldn't normally lay like that"
FFS.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj23VHjAS5g 4:30
Not sure this is the thread to talk about it (?), but yeah, they've been trying to cover up the atrocious Bucha massacre.
And this whole timing to hide/delete the whole Ukraine crisis thread at the same time is really unfortunate, doesn't look or feel great, does it SMH
And this whole timing to hide/delete the whole Ukraine crisis thread at the same time is really unfortunate, doesn't look or feel great, does it SMH
eatyourgreens wrote: ↑Thu Apr 07, 2022 1:27 amBack on topic, I have just watched a video on you tube, an interviewer is stopping Russian citizens in the street and asking them if they have seen what has happened in Bucha.
One Russian woman said "its fake, its totally fake, all the bodies are laying in unnatural positions, they wouldn't normally lay like that"
FFS.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj23VHjAS5g 4:30
We will move these over to it once its been sorted and can be put back liveKai wrote: ↑Thu Apr 07, 2022 1:57 amNot sure this is the thread to talk about it (?), but yeah, they've been trying to cover up the atrocious Bucha massacre.
And this whole timing to hide/delete the whole Ukraine crisis thread at the same time is really unfortunate, doesn't look or feel great, does it SMH
Don't know why Zelensky's singling out BJ for special treatment, given what the Pols have done and the obstacles we've put in place for Ukrainian refugees. He was probably partying in Kyiv before he left.
Last edited by Derek27 on Mon Apr 11, 2022 2:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Archery1969
- Posts: 4478
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
Probably because British Forces were helping to train Ukraine soldiers on how to use different weapon systems prior to the Russian invasion and been training them via Poland on how to use the newly sent StarStreak II.
There is also some chatter on the British Forces forums that Zelensky person protection unit is from Hereford. They not classed as regular soldiers so not much for Putin to moan about. No idea if that’s true.
Apparently we have also sent non defensive weapons which everyone else was reluctant to send. Neither the UK or Ukraine are explaining what weapons exactly as again not to upset someone in Russia.
I think the UK defence minister made a mistake when he said we are training Ukraine forces and quickly changed the subject. After all, UK forces are not supposed to be in Ukraine but I imagine they are in some capacity.
Zelensky has been speaking to BoJo almost twice a day since this started according to an article in the Telegraph. Again, no idea if that’s true.
I know UK forces were in Ukraine but I imagined they moved out along with the US before the invasion started. Zelensky must be pretty bored being in hiding, to want to talk to BJ twice a day!Archery1969 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 10, 2022 4:46 pmProbably because British Forces were helping to train Ukraine soldiers on how to use different weapon systems prior to the Russian invasion and been training them via Poland on how to use the newly sent StarStreak II.
There is also some chatter on the British Forces forums that Zelensky person protection unit is from Hereford. They not classed as regular soldiers so not much for Putin to moan about. No idea if that’s true.
Apparently we have also sent non defensive weapons which everyone else was reluctant to send. Neither the UK or Ukraine are explaining what weapons exactly as again not to upset someone in Russia.
I think the UK defence minister made a mistake when he said we are training Ukraine forces and quickly changed the subject. After all, UK forces are not supposed to be in Ukraine but I imagine they are in some capacity.
Zelensky has been speaking to BoJo almost twice a day since this started according to an article in the Telegraph. Again, no idea if that’s true.
-
Archery1969
- Posts: 4478
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
Officially all regular soldiers left before the invasion.Derek27 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 10, 2022 5:15 pmI know UK forces were in Ukraine but I imagined they moved out along with the US before the invasion started. Zelensky must be pretty bored being in hiding, to want to talk to BJ twice a day!Archery1969 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 10, 2022 4:46 pmProbably because British Forces were helping to train Ukraine soldiers on how to use different weapon systems prior to the Russian invasion and been training them via Poland on how to use the newly sent StarStreak II.
There is also some chatter on the British Forces forums that Zelensky person protection unit is from Hereford. They not classed as regular soldiers so not much for Putin to moan about. No idea if that’s true.
Apparently we have also sent non defensive weapons which everyone else was reluctant to send. Neither the UK or Ukraine are explaining what weapons exactly as again not to upset someone in Russia.
I think the UK defence minister made a mistake when he said we are training Ukraine forces and quickly changed the subject. After all, UK forces are not supposed to be in Ukraine but I imagine they are in some capacity.
Zelensky has been speaking to BoJo almost twice a day since this started according to an article in the Telegraph. Again, no idea if that’s true.
But some are using the term ‘Advisers’ remained there. What that term is actually referring too is anyones guess.
Perhaps BJ knows he is done for and looking for a new role in the Ukraine government one day.
I'd guess they advise the bullet on which way to go by aiming the gun.Archery1969 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 10, 2022 5:21 pmBut some are using the term ‘Advisers’ remained there. What that term is actually referring too is anyones guess.
"Ukraine War: Russia warns Sweden and Finland against Nato membership"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-61066503
Does Russia not get the message? Nobody wants to be under their sphere of influence. It's so blindingly obvious.
The Swedes are utterly pragmatic about what's good for them. They are likely to choose Nato - go figure Moscow!
Ironically a Swede I knew described Finns as "a bit Russian", but they too prefer Nato as an ally.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-61066503
Does Russia not get the message? Nobody wants to be under their sphere of influence. It's so blindingly obvious.
The Swedes are utterly pragmatic about what's good for them. They are likely to choose Nato - go figure Moscow!
Ironically a Swede I knew described Finns as "a bit Russian", but they too prefer Nato as an ally.
-
Archery1969
- Posts: 4478
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
I highly doubt Russia will allow Finland to join Nato. They will probably invade, which probably would start WW3.greenmark wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 2:20 pm"Ukraine War: Russia warns Sweden and Finland against Nato membership"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-61066503
Does Russia not get the message? Nobody wants to be under their sphere of influence. It's so blindingly obvious.
The Swedes are utterly pragmatic about what's good for them. They are likely to choose Nato - go figure Moscow!
Ironically a Swede I knew described Finns as "a bit Russian", but they too prefer Nato as an ally.
And that defines the insanity within the current Russian regime.Archery1969 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 2:54 pmI highly doubt Russia will allow Finland to join Nato. They will probably invade, which probably would start WW3.greenmark wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 2:20 pm"Ukraine War: Russia warns Sweden and Finland against Nato membership"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-61066503
Does Russia not get the message? Nobody wants to be under their sphere of influence. It's so blindingly obvious.
The Swedes are utterly pragmatic about what's good for them. They are likely to choose Nato - go figure Moscow!
Ironically a Swede I knew described Finns as "a bit Russian", but they too prefer Nato as an ally.
Who are Russia to allow or disallow a sovereign state to choose their allies?
Lets face it the one ace card Russia has is nuclear. A nation of 44million has given a nation of 144million a bloody nose. The best Russia can do is launch a relentless bombardment of Mariupol. Wanton destruction is not going to endear you to decent human beings. The irony of a nation that suffered at the hands of Nazi's now pummeling a neighbour in the 21st century is absolutely staggering.
-
Archery1969
- Posts: 4478
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
The US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has now successfully tested hypersonic missiles travelling at Mach 5 or 3,600 miles per hour. This was completed in March but kept secret as not to antagonise Russia.
This will now be incorporated into the NATO missile defence system. Timeframe by end of 2022.
That means if Russia launches Nuclear hypersonic missiles then NATO stands a much better chance of intercepting them.
Although I have no idea what happens if there is a Nuclear explosion at 35,000 feet.
This will now be incorporated into the NATO missile defence system. Timeframe by end of 2022.
That means if Russia launches Nuclear hypersonic missiles then NATO stands a much better chance of intercepting them.
Although I have no idea what happens if there is a Nuclear explosion at 35,000 feet.
Hypersonic missiles are offensive, they won't stop incoming missiles. The blast from most nuclear warheads would do widespread damage even at 35,000 feet. If you're gonna use nuclear missiles to stop a missile attack you need to go into space or where the atmosphere is so thin there would be virtually no blast effect. Incidentally, Russia only have hypersonic missiles because the US announced a project to strike anywhere in the world within an hour with the use of hypersonic missiles, but the Russians beat them to the technology.Archery1969 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 5:29 pmThe US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has now successfully tested hypersonic missiles travelling at Mach 5 or 3,600 miles per hour. This was completed in March but kept secret as not to antagonise Russia.
This will now be incorporated into the NATO missile defence system. Timeframe by end of 2022.
That means if Russia launches Nuclear hypersonic missiles then NATO stands a much better chance of intercepting them.
Although I have no idea what happens if there is a Nuclear explosion at 35,000 feet.
I think it's time we start a nuclear thread.
Last edited by Derek27 on Mon Apr 11, 2022 6:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
