I assume they are Corbin supporters.
PMQs should be entertaining this week.
Derek27 wrote: ↑Sun May 08, 2022 1:49 pmI never call somebody a liar unless it's clear cut. Denying any knowledge of a party you've been to or denying knowing you're at a party is lying, plain and simple. Labour back-stabbers are out and I've heard reports of people present saying they didn't go back to work after the curry and beer and there were people present who weren't working and just turned up to a social gathering but it's yet to be verified.
I'm getting sick of hearing the term 'beergate'. It's only an accusation and as such, doesn't fit the criteria to be called a 'gate'.![]()
If you've got a clip of that please post the link.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 7:08 amDerek27 wrote: ↑Sun May 08, 2022 1:49 pmI never call somebody a liar unless it's clear cut. Denying any knowledge of a party you've been to or denying knowing you're at a party is lying, plain and simple. Labour back-stabbers are out and I've heard reports of people present saying they didn't go back to work after the curry and beer and there were people present who weren't working and just turned up to a social gathering but it's yet to be verified.
I'm getting sick of hearing the term 'beergate'. It's only an accusation and as such, doesn't fit the criteria to be called a 'gate'.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
... sounds like there's one rule for Captain Hindsight and Cruella and another rule for everyone else!
![]()
![]()
(now where have I heard that one recently? Oh, and don't forget Captain H. said just being investigated was a resigning issue!! He's being investigated!![]()
![]()
)
No clip but apparently on 31 January – he tweeted: "Honesty and decency matter. After months of denials the Prime Minister is now under criminal investigations for breaking his own lockdown laws. He needs to do the decent thing and resign." ... I don't do Twitter so cannot go further.Derek27 wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 10:30 amIf you've got a clip of that please post the link.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 7:08 amDerek27 wrote: ↑Sun May 08, 2022 1:49 pmI never call somebody a liar unless it's clear cut. Denying any knowledge of a party you've been to or denying knowing you're at a party is lying, plain and simple. Labour back-stabbers are out and I've heard reports of people present saying they didn't go back to work after the curry and beer and there were people present who weren't working and just turned up to a social gathering but it's yet to be verified.
I'm getting sick of hearing the term 'beergate'. It's only an accusation and as such, doesn't fit the criteria to be called a 'gate'.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
... sounds like there's one rule for Captain Hindsight and Cruella and another rule for everyone else!
![]()
![]()
(now where have I heard that one recently? Oh, and don't forget Captain H. said just being investigated was a resigning issue!! He's being investigated!![]()
![]()
)
My take on that is that he's not demanding the PM's resignation because he's under police investigation but because of months of denials and lying through his teeth in a manner an eight-year-old would think he could get away with.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 11:42 amNo clip but apparently on 31 January – he tweeted: "Honesty and decency matter. After months of denials the Prime Minister is now under criminal investigations for breaking his own lockdown laws. He needs to do the decent thing and resign." ... I don't do Twitter so cannot go further.Derek27 wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 10:30 amIf you've got a clip of that please post the link.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 7:08 am
![]()
![]()
![]()
... sounds like there's one rule for Captain Hindsight and Cruella and another rule for everyone else!
![]()
![]()
(now where have I heard that one recently? Oh, and don't forget Captain H. said just being investigated was a resigning issue!! He's being investigated!![]()
![]()
)
If I was Starmer, I'd make any resignation subject to the result of an appeal. It's quite daft allowing a police officer to decide your fate and the guy's a barrister so he should know if he's got a case. BJ was probably advised that he's near-certain to lose any appeal.
An appeal would mean a court case and if found guilty would result in a criminal conviction on his record. Just accepting the fine means nothing is on your record.Derek27 wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 3:33 pmIf I was Starmer, I'd make any resignation subject to the result of an appeal. It's quite daft allowing a police officer to decide your fate and the guy's a barrister so he should know if he's got a case. BJ was probably advised that he's near-certain to lose any appeal.![]()
There's no harm in keeping his options open. I don't know the exact procedure but generally, government departments that make decisions against you have to give reasons for their decision. It's the reasons that you appeal rather than the decision. Simply agreeing to resign if a civil servant wants you to go opens the door for an FPN with grossly inadequate reasons.Archery1969 wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 3:41 pmAn appeal would mean a court case and if found guilty would result in a criminal conviction on his record. Just accepting the fine means nothing is on your record.Derek27 wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 3:33 pmIf I was Starmer, I'd make any resignation subject to the result of an appeal. It's quite daft allowing a police officer to decide your fate and the guy's a barrister so he should know if he's got a case. BJ was probably advised that he's near-certain to lose any appeal.![]()