New PC charge now up to 60% from 18 July 2011
I asked Betfair how they justified the increase. This was their cut-and-paste reply:
'Our aim is to create a pricing structure that is fair for all of our customer using the exchange.
This adjustment ensures we are seeing fair returns for the service we provide to this very small number of our most successful of customers.
We believe this new adjustment sets a fair threshold, above which, we are entitled to ask customers to pay the charge at a higher rate for the service we provide them'.
Jeff
'Our aim is to create a pricing structure that is fair for all of our customer using the exchange.
This adjustment ensures we are seeing fair returns for the service we provide to this very small number of our most successful of customers.
We believe this new adjustment sets a fair threshold, above which, we are entitled to ask customers to pay the charge at a higher rate for the service we provide them'.
Jeff
The problem is though Betdaq needs more losing punters not more pro traders.george wrote:i dont think its game over we just need to move to a different company thats all we have betdaq dont we ? only thing we do need is a updated platform .
its game over for betfair
And unfortuantly there is still no reason for them to use betdaq over betfair.
thats why Betdaq could not capitalise very much when the first P.C was introduced

- superfrank
- Posts: 2762
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:28 pm
PREMIUM CHARGE FAQ
https://promotions.betfair.com/pcharge/
https://promotions.betfair.com/pcharge/
'Doublespeak' is the word that comes to mind...
Jeff
Jeff
superfrank wrote:PREMIUM CHARGE FAQ
https://promotions.betfair.com/pcharge/
- superfrank
- Posts: 2762
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:28 pm
That's true.freddy wrote:The problem is though Betdaq needs more losing punters not more pro traders.
And unfortuantly there is still no reason for them to use betdaq over betfair.
thats why Betdaq could not capitalise very much when the first P.C was introduced.
What they need is a 2 pronged approach - say 2% commission for punters and (up to) 5% commission for traders.
I don't know too much about Betdaq - does their technical infrastructure cut it in comparison to BF? (no laughing at the back!).
I'm inclined to disagree (although you could be right).
Take a trader who earns £100K per year. Currently, he pays £20K premium charge. He probably also turns over something like £50 million per year, so pays a bob or two in commission.
Why would it be in Betfair's interests to scare off that trader?
Jeff
Take a trader who earns £100K per year. Currently, he pays £20K premium charge. He probably also turns over something like £50 million per year, so pays a bob or two in commission.
Why would it be in Betfair's interests to scare off that trader?
Jeff
Zenyatta wrote:Seems to run totally contrary to the claim that winners are welcome. The 20% seemed tolerable, but 60% is clearly designed to force out (in a very heavy-handed fashion) anyone who exceeds the 250k threshold.
- superfrank
- Posts: 2762
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:28 pm
It is a similar approach to Labour's "soak the rich" taxation policies in the 70s. This resulted in a brain drain and Britain having to call in the IMF!Zenyatta wrote:Seems to run totally contrary to the claim that winners are welcome. The 20% seemed tolerable, but 60% is clearly designed to force out (in a very heavy-handed fashion) anyone who exceeds the 250k threshold.
There comes a point when increasing tax rates actually generates less revenue - see Laffer curve http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laffer_curve.
-
- Posts: 4619
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:23 pm
Because £80,000 leaves the pool forever. If it stays in the pool Betfair eventually get it all.Ferru123 wrote:I'm inclined to disagree (although you could be right).
Take a trader who earns £100K per year. Currently, he pays £20K premium charge. He probably also turns over something like £50 million per year, so pays a bob or two in commission.
Why would it be in Betfair's interests to scare off that trader?
-
- Posts: 4619
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:23 pm
They don't directly to any great extent but indirectly yes, one prime example being Peter Webb, how many of us here would be trading without the likes of him. As for the quote of 500 people, that may be true as of today, but what about in a years time, five years time, or 10 years time. £250,000 isn't much over Betfair's 10 years but add in another 5 years or more and it becomes less and less.
Anyone know of any banks looking for traders
Anyone know of any banks looking for traders

-
- Posts: 4619
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:23 pm
That would be Mike Baker.Ferru123 wrote:There was a trader whose name I forget, who had a well-known blog, who quit Betfair trading to trade in the City.