Micro stakes compounding, he could do it!sniffer66 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 7:28 am$10 of $10k raised. HahahaRealrocknrolla wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 7:26 amLMAO
https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-fund-gr ... g-strategy
Greyhound Musings
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
Thought I'd revisit Pelaw Grange again for their Sunday meeting.
Even accounting for the Trap 1 bias, in this race T3 looks to have been given a chance with a clear run opportunity and a drop in grade recently. However, I can see T1 capitalise if it falters. The Racing Post tip the T1, so that could be a negative value wise. No actual prices up yet.
Even accounting for the Trap 1 bias, in this race T3 looks to have been given a chance with a clear run opportunity and a drop in grade recently. However, I can see T1 capitalise if it falters. The Racing Post tip the T1, so that could be a negative value wise. No actual prices up yet.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
Pelaw Grange Result
Didn't anticipate the T5 trapping so well. (The racing manager may ask a question about it's overall improvement). Encouraging I found the market leader in the race, others read the race in the same way, wrong result though.
Didn't anticipate the T5 trapping so well. (The racing manager may ask a question about it's overall improvement). Encouraging I found the market leader in the race, others read the race in the same way, wrong result though.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
The Romford 1.09 race seemed to work out okay, but when value betting, winners can be missed. (applied a Min odds factor 1.30)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- MemphisFlash
- Posts: 2222
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 10:12 pm
- Location: Leicester
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
Got lots of good info all in one place there,
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
Getting some consistency. Monmore's not a track I'd normally look at, although it's a fair one.
The clear TR was also good value, courtesy of the T1 that went off at 7/4f?! The winning time was almost spot on, so maybe I should include Monmore on my list.
The clear TR was also good value, courtesy of the T1 that went off at 7/4f?! The winning time was almost spot on, so maybe I should include Monmore on my list.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- MemphisFlash
- Posts: 2222
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 10:12 pm
- Location: Leicester
Monmore Fav stats
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
Nice stats for value layers/backers.
-------------------
I only focussed on 3 qualifying races today.
My TR not mentioned in the first 3 with timeform.
-------------------
Same as previous race, interesting.
-------------------
Of course we both agree and it misses the break.
--------------------
Overall consistency is still there with good track/race/grade selectivity.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
Maybe too good to be true?
T3 should get first run on T2. T1 could cause some crowding.
T3 should get first run on T2. T1 could cause some crowding.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
The puppy (T2) ran well, T3 was fair value, but did get crowded with an average break.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
How do you get the 'ratings'? Are these scraped from the post or are you attributing points based on certain metrics to generate your own?wearthefoxhat wrote: ↑Sun Jul 10, 2022 11:17 amMaybe too good to be true?
PGr 11.58.png
T3 should get first run on T2. T1 could cause some crowding.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
Shaung89 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 10, 2022 5:54 pmHow do you get the 'ratings'? Are these scraped from the post or are you attributing points based on certain metrics to generate your own?wearthefoxhat wrote: ↑Sun Jul 10, 2022 11:17 amMaybe too good to be true?
PGr 11.58.png
T3 should get first run on T2. T1 could cause some crowding.
The ratings are calculated in the same way the Betting Tissue Tool is set up within Inform Racing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbM0-9g6xFU
The form metrics are ones, from the Racing Post Form cards, that I feel are the most significant to produce an overall rating. It's then a question of seeing if there's value backs or value lays.
The following are all factored into the mix;
Time(s)
Clean run potential
Age
Grade/Class
Track Bias/Advantage
Certain tracks/grades/form lines are preferred, so essentially means there are only 4-5 races a day to focus on.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
4 races covered today.
Overall contrasting results, but still promising going forward.
Overall contrasting results, but still promising going forward.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
Still encouraging results going forward. I've noticed between my TR and the Timeform TR, we invariably get the winner. If we both agree on the TR, then it tends to go tits up.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.