So c1.16 for most seats (almost a certainty) & 1.36 for overall majority...
If the election was held tomorrow, I'd expect most seats price to be less than 1.05
==> c11%to 15% for uncertainty over timing (and a maybe a big unexpected)?
So c1.16 for most seats (almost a certainty) & 1.36 for overall majority...
I can't claim to be a Market expert, far from it but does the news move markets or the Opinion Polls?greenmark wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2023 11:27 pmBut the market is taking no notice of the noise at the moment. It's like everyone has gone to sleep.
I don't understand the way markets move.
It may well be we're too far out from the main event for anyone to change their opinion yet.
I really did expect the Labour revolt over Starmer's stance on an Israeli ceasefire to have some impact. But there was absolutely no effect.
The market seems like a sleeping wolf waiting for some major political event.
I don't know. But one of my bosses (way back) had a tv in his office with teletext financial info all the time.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 11:57 amI can't claim to be a Market expert, far from it but does the news move markets or the Opinion Polls?greenmark wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2023 11:27 pmBut the market is taking no notice of the noise at the moment. It's like everyone has gone to sleep.
I don't understand the way markets move.
It may well be we're too far out from the main event for anyone to change their opinion yet.
I really did expect the Labour revolt over Starmer's stance on an Israeli ceasefire to have some impact. But there was absolutely no effect.
The market seems like a sleeping wolf waiting for some major political event.
Well, if this data is true and unless lots of people have changed their minds then you will need to wait until a large number of the over 45s have snuffed it. But I guess anything is possible.
I wonder how Starmer is going to handle this question. Every economic failure has and will be blamed on Brexit by some.
Yes but they will be replaced with the next wave of over 45'sArchery1969 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 7:39 pmWell, if this data is true and unless lots of people have changed their minds then you will need to wait until a large number of the over 45s have snuffed it. But I guess anything is possible.
I guess if they allow the over 16s to vote during a general election then its possible.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 9:16 pmYes but they will be replaced with the next wave of over 45'sArchery1969 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 7:39 pmWell, if this data is true and unless lots of people have changed their minds then you will need to wait until a large number of the over 45s have snuffed it. But I guess anything is possible.General consensus seems to be that you are likely to be Left of Centre and a Remainer/Joiner when young but gradually moving across to be Right of Centre and a Leaver as you get older.
Well SNP (3rd largest party) are but I suspect you mean Lab or Cons... If anything that will keep the debate alive (and used to skewer labour), at least in Scotland.
I think the main issue was not testing them before the move into care homes but that may have been an NHS guidance issue / failure rather than specifically MH's fault.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2023 7:00 amMany criticise MH's decision to return elderly patients to their care-home but like MH I've yet to hear a better option. Leave them in the hospital and turn away new patients or move them out of hospital to free up beds for new patients. Is there a third option other than sharing beds?!
If they were showing symptoms rhey should have been eligible to stay in the hospital, if not then why detain them? I said 'eligible' because again what do you do if you don't have enough beds to keep everyone in the hospital?sionascaig wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2023 11:08 amI think the main issue was not testing them before the move into care homes but that may have been an NHS guidance issue / failure rather than specifically MH's fault.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2023 7:00 amMany criticise MH's decision to return elderly patients to their care-home but like MH I've yet to hear a better option. Leave them in the hospital and turn away new patients or move them out of hospital to free up beds for new patients. Is there a third option other than sharing beds?!
Was it not the case that seemingly dischargeable NHS patients were at greater risk in a hospital than a care home?firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2023 3:58 pmIf they were showing symptoms rhey should have been eligible to stay in the hospital, if not then why detain them? I said 'eligible' because again what do you do if you don't have enough beds to keep everyone in the hospital?sionascaig wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2023 11:08 amI think the main issue was not testing them before the move into care homes but that may have been an NHS guidance issue / failure rather than specifically MH's fault.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2023 7:00 amMany criticise MH's decision to return elderly patients to their care-home but like MH I've yet to hear a better option. Leave them in the hospital and turn away new patients or move them out of hospital to free up beds for new patients. Is there a third option other than sharing beds?!