The Situation Room

[ForFolksSake]

fckn idiots... wrapping the st georges tells me all i need to know - move on, nothing to see! overwhelmed by the female support - lol

Somebody has got to protect the British public
Let me remind you of what has just happened

3 children stabbed to death and 5 still in hospital critically injured

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Nottingham_attacks

https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-mp-d ... ng-attack/

It's been dealt with.

Until the next time ...

[jimibt]

I think some people need to calm down.

Its too hot for arguing, better off drinking some beer and making love in the cold tub.

might jump in the cold tub and self administer

[Archery1969]

I think some people need to calm down.

Its too hot for arguing, better off drinking some beer and making love in the cold tub.

might jump in the cold tub and self administer

[greenmark]

Earlier is this thread I disputed Derek27' definition of a Merseysider.
It appears we were both right.
I defined Merseyside on county lines. But the Mersey's source is actually at the confluence of the Tame and Goyt, in central Stockport, Greater Manchester.
So those in Stockport are indeed on the side the Mersey.
Sometimes forum posts can educate.

[ForFolksSake]

fckn idiots... wrapping the st georges tells me all i need to know - move on, nothing to see! overwhelmed by the female support - lol

Somebody has got to protect the British public
Let me remind you of what has just happened

3 children stabbed to death and 5 still in hospital critically injured

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Nottingham_attacks

https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-mp-d ... ng-attack/

It may have escaped your notice but the culprit was arrested and will doubtless face a long time behind bars.
It's been dealt with.

Bring back Corporal punishment - he should be sentenced to nothing less

[greenmark]

Somebody has got to protect the British public
Let me remind you of what has just happened

3 children stabbed to death and 5 still in hospital critically injured

It may have escaped your notice but the culprit was arrested and will doubtless face a long time behind bars.
It's been dealt with.

Bring back Corporal punishment - he should be sentenced to nothing less

Corporal punishment? So you're going to flog him before locking him up for decades? No enquiry into what motivated him so we could try to prevent the same again.
No, just lash him with the whip. That will sort it all, I despair sometimes. And I'm done on this .

[ForFolksSake]

It may have escaped your notice but the culprit was arrested and will doubtless face a long time behind bars.
It's been dealt with.

Bring back Corporal punishment - he should be sentenced to nothing less

Corporal punishment? So you're going to flog him before locking him up for decades? No enquiry into what motivated him so we could try to prevent the same again.

Actually he should be sentenced to death - thrown to the lions.
That should act as a pretty good deterrent to stop it happening again

[Archery1969]

Well, for me, in very clear cut cases, this is one, no doubt in anyone’s mind he did it.

Then he should be hanged.

I’m not worried about the deterrent element or not of hanging as it’s going to cost £42,000 x 30 = £1.2 million minimum to keep him locked up.

That has nothing to do with my political views. I have always thought that if you take a life, especially children, then you should face the ultimate punishment.

People might say, well you only got to hang one wrong person to argue against. But like I said, where it is 100% clear cut then it’s in the public interest rather than spending millions keep these nut jobs locked up.

Plus it would help free up prison places.

[greenmark]

Well, for me, in very clear cut cases, this is one, no doubt in anyone’s mind he did it.

Then he should be hanged.

I’m not worried about the deterrent element or not of hanging as it’s going to cost £42,000 x 30 = £1.2 million minimum to keep him locked up.

That has nothing to do with my political views. I have always thought that if you take a life, especially children, then you should face the ultimate punishment.

People might say, well you only got to hang one wrong person to argue against. But like I said, where it is 100% clear cut then it’s in the public interest rather than spending millions keep these nut jobs locked up.

Plus it would help free up prison places.

He's 17. Legally still a chld. If one fact in this episode stunned me it was his age.
What possible ratioanale could he have developed to conclude what he did wasn't anything but the most dreadful of crimes?
Time will tell on this. I don't think it's as plan and simple as bad person. It's way more complex and I hope the authorities ge to the bottom of it.
Running around like headless chickens trashing stuff in a fit of deflected anger is plain daft.

[jimibt]

Well, for me, in very clear cut cases, this is one, no doubt in anyone’s mind he did it.

Then he should be hanged.

I’m not worried about the deterrent element or not of hanging as it’s going to cost £42,000 x 30 = £1.2 million minimum to keep him locked up.

That has nothing to do with my political views. I have always thought that if you take a life, especially children, then you should face the ultimate punishment.

People might say, well you only got to hang one wrong person to argue against. But like I said, where it is 100% clear cut then it’s in the public interest rather than spending millions keep these nut jobs locked up.

Plus it would help free up prison places.

He's 17. Legally still a chld. If one fact in this episode stunned me it was his age.
What possible ratioanale could he have developed to conclude what he did wasn't anything but the most dreadful of crimes?
Time will tell on this. I don't think it's as plan and simple as bad person. It's way more complex and I hope the authorities ge to the bottom of it.
Running around like headless chickens trashing stuff in a fit of deflected anger is plain daft.

prolly worth repeating this (thanks spikeybob -this made my day y'day)

https://x.com/MikeN0926/status/1818406002514895056

[greenmark]

Well, for me, in very clear cut cases, this is one, no doubt in anyone’s mind he did it.

Then he should be hanged.

I’m not worried about the deterrent element or not of hanging as it’s going to cost £42,000 x 30 = £1.2 million minimum to keep him locked up.

That has nothing to do with my political views. I have always thought that if you take a life, especially children, then you should face the ultimate punishment.

People might say, well you only got to hang one wrong person to argue against. But like I said, where it is 100% clear cut then it’s in the public interest rather than spending millions keep these nut jobs locked up.

Plus it would help free up prison places.

He's 17. Legally still a chld. If one fact in this episode stunned me it was his age.
What possible ratioanale could he have developed to conclude what he did wasn't anything but the most dreadful of crimes?
Time will tell on this. I don't think it's as plan and simple as bad person. It's way more complex and I hope the authorities ge to the bottom of it.
Running around like headless chickens trashing stuff in a fit of deflected anger is plain daft.

prolly worth repeating this (thanks spikeybob -this made my day y'day)

https://x.com/MikeN0926/status/1818406002514895056

Indeed
+1

[jimibt]

Bring back Corporal punishment - he should be sentenced to nothing less

Corporal punishment? So you're going to flog him before locking him up for decades? No enquiry into what motivated him so we could try to prevent the same again.

Actually he should be sentenced to death - thrown to the lions.
That should act as a pretty good deterrent to stop it happening again

if that were still enshrined in law, then the demise of stephen lawrence's killers may well have prevented this tragedy, so you may have a point - we'll never know.

[ForFolksSake]

Well, for me, in very clear cut cases, this is one, no doubt in anyone’s mind he did it.

Then he should be hanged.

I’m not worried about the deterrent element or not of hanging as it’s going to cost £42,000 x 30 = £1.2 million minimum to keep him locked up.

That has nothing to do with my political views. I have always thought that if you take a life, especially children, then you should face the ultimate punishment.

People might say, well you only got to hang one wrong person to argue against. But like I said, where it is 100% clear cut then it’s in the public interest rather than spending millions keep these nut jobs locked up.

Plus it would help free up prison places.

He's 17. Legally still a chld. If one fact in this episode stunned me it was his age.
What possible ratioanale could he have developed to conclude what he did wasn't anything but the most dreadful of crimes?
Time will tell on this. I don't think it's as plan and simple as bad person. It's way more complex and I hope the authorities ge to the bottom of it.
Running around like headless chickens trashing stuff in a fit of deflected anger is plain daft.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/ ... y-33373340

[Archery1969]

Well, for me, in very clear cut cases, this is one, no doubt in anyone’s mind he did it.

Then he should be hanged.

I’m not worried about the deterrent element or not of hanging as it’s going to cost £42,000 x 30 = £1.2 million minimum to keep him locked up.

That has nothing to do with my political views. I have always thought that if you take a life, especially children, then you should face the ultimate punishment.

People might say, well you only got to hang one wrong person to argue against. But like I said, where it is 100% clear cut then it’s in the public interest rather than spending millions keep these nut jobs locked up.

Plus it would help free up prison places.

He's 17. Legally still a chld. If one fact in this episode stunned me it was his age.
What possible ratioanale could he have developed to conclude what he did wasn't anything but the most dreadful of crimes?
Time will tell on this. I don't think it's as plan and simple as bad person. It's way more complex and I hope the authorities ge to the bottom of it.
Running around like headless chickens trashing stuff in a fit of deflected anger is plain daft.

I wouldn’t class 17 as a child, he’ll, aren’t Labour going to change voting laws to 16 ?

However, having watched my nephews play Call of Duty and listening to their thinking I was somewhat worried. Kind of glad they don’t have access to real weapons.

Those games are rated +15 and +18 but how many over +10 are being allowed to play them by parents ?

PS. I joined the Army in late 1980s, shorncliff barracks. End of week one, Knife training, in, twist, out. What’s the reason for that Sgt ? Blood won’t coagulate, minimal chance of person surving medical treatment. Is that the right think to be teaching a 17 year old ?

[greenmark]

Well, for me, in very clear cut cases, this is one, no doubt in anyone’s mind he did it.

Then he should be hanged.

I’m not worried about the deterrent element or not of hanging as it’s going to cost £42,000 x 30 = £1.2 million minimum to keep him locked up.

That has nothing to do with my political views. I have always thought that if you take a life, especially children, then you should face the ultimate punishment.

People might say, well you only got to hang one wrong person to argue against. But like I said, where it is 100% clear cut then it’s in the public interest rather than spending millions keep these nut jobs locked up.

Plus it would help free up prison places.

He's 17. Legally still a chld. If one fact in this episode stunned me it was his age.
What possible ratioanale could he have developed to conclude what he did wasn't anything but the most dreadful of crimes?
Time will tell on this. I don't think it's as plan and simple as bad person. It's way more complex and I hope the authorities ge to the bottom of it.
Running around like headless chickens trashing stuff in a fit of deflected anger is plain daft.

I wouldn’t class 17 as a child, he’ll, aren’t Labour going to change voting laws to 16 ?

However, having watched my nephews play Call of Duty and listening to their thinking I was somewhat worried. Kind of glad they don’t have access to real weapons.

Those games are rated +15 and +18 but how many over +10 are being allowed to play them by parents ?

PS. I joined the Army in late 1980s, shorncliff barracks. End of week one, Knife training, in, twist, out. What’s the reason for that Sgt ? Blood won’t coagulate, minimal chance of person surving medical treatment. Is that the right think to be teaching a 17 year old ?

You were 17? You were being trained? Who was training the Southport !7 yeard old to do what he did. I would suggest nobody. It's a tragic anomoly that needs calm analysis not lobbing bricks at coppers or mosques.
I really need to stay away from this thread now. If I pop up again tell me to go away.