greenmark wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 2:21 pm
firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 5:46 am
ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2025 8:59 am
52 years
Bring back the f***ing death penalty
Yeah, the taxpayer now has to provide not just board and lodgings for 52+ years but also extra security to protect him from those in prison who totally despise his 'type' ... let's hope the guards drop their protection and leave him exposed for a while.
How about why did he become so vicious? I don't have that answer. It's beyond me. But I still don't support capital punishment. Pierrepoint described it as "what I have done I have not prevented a single murder". And no more than revenge.
That boy is a nutter. We produced him. We now have to contain him.
The comments I have seen in relation to capital punishment especially from those who supported assisted dying I find interesting. How can anyone support the state taking the life of an innocent individual with with safeguards but not be in support of the state taking the the life of a guilty individual with safe guards.
Just a general observation.
His parents produced him, they are in it up to their necks especially the father. If you put the lack of parental responsibility with catastrophic state failure we may get somewhere near the truth but I doubt it we'll ever get the full truth, anytime soon. We might do in about 20 years just look at how long it's took for Hillsborough, Infected Blood, Post Office, Grenfell etc etc etc The state don't like accepting responsibility because it costs votes and money.
Look at the Muslim rape gang scandal no national inquiry because it means the state will have to take responsibility and pay compensation. One of the Jay report recommendations called for redress to the victims the Government don't want to know on that one, nothing to see here.