Interpreting the markets is not like reading a book or a story, instead it's...

A place to discuss anything.
Post Reply
arbitrage16
Posts: 566
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2017 7:27 pm

complete the sentence!

Interpreting the markets is not like reading a book or a story, instead it's...
User avatar
ShaunWhite
Posts: 10355
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am

..... like looking for the spelling mistakes in the book.
Fugazi
Posts: 932
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2024 7:20 pm

arbitrage16 wrote:
Thu Mar 20, 2025 8:55 pm
complete the sentence!

Interpreting the markets is not like reading a book or a story, instead it's...
Removing a sentence and seeing if the ending changed
displayyouthful
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2025 3:42 am

...more like piecing together a puzzle (geometry arrow), where each new piece of information might change the picture, and you need to continuously adapt your strategy as new data unfolds.
Last edited by displayyouthful on Thu Mar 27, 2025 2:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jimibt
Posts: 4193
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 6:42 pm

...like trying to predict the weather in Scotland—unpredictable and full of surprises. 🌦️ :lol:
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 26211
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm

is like a long, unpredictable novel. Every price movement is a sentence, every trend is a chapter. Sometimes it's a thriller with sharp turns; other times, a slow drama (sideways market).
User avatar
ForFolksSake
Posts: 864
Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm

..... like going around in Circles ⭕

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REp-3KdVmkM
User avatar
ShaunWhite
Posts: 10355
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am

It's interesting to see the perspectives. Everything I do is based on market snaps, I never look back and never try to predict the future. I see no 'story', just the words.

Guess that's the difference between people watching markets one by one and seeing narratives vs seeing them as a set where 'market' and 'time' are amorphous and it's all about inference and structural inefficiencies.

Same game same outcome but "perception is not a passive reflection of the world, but an active construction by the mind." (paraphrased from Kant's Critique of Pure Reason). Kant argued that space, time, and causality aren’t external realities but categories imposed by our mind, so what we call reality is a structured internal representation, not direct access to “the thing-in-itself”.

We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are.

Great question though, it's why strategy choice isn't prescriptive, everyone has a different reality.
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion”