Hi Dallas,
I kept playing with this and found a simple solution. Gotta say I am a little bit proud of myself.
Regards,
Anthony
Back and Lay Runners Depending on their Recent Form / Finishing Positions Guardian Automation Bot
Hi Dallas,
I do have one question. I run 2 separate automation rules, one for lays and one for back bets. Each rule has two possible choices but I have conditions that only allow only one choice to be executed. The condition only allows 1 matched bet on the back bet and 1 matched bet on the lay. I am happy to allow 1 lay and 1 back at the same time so do I have to make the conditions so that it allows two matched bets across both automation rules or do they work totally independent which would then allow one matched bet on each automation. Do you get what I mean?
Regards,
Anthony
I do have one question. I run 2 separate automation rules, one for lays and one for back bets. Each rule has two possible choices but I have conditions that only allow only one choice to be executed. The condition only allows 1 matched bet on the back bet and 1 matched bet on the lay. I am happy to allow 1 lay and 1 back at the same time so do I have to make the conditions so that it allows two matched bets across both automation rules or do they work totally independent which would then allow one matched bet on each automation. Do you get what I mean?
Regards,
Anthony
The 'Number of matched bets' rule looks at the all matched bets on your BF account for that market, irrespective of were or how the bets were placedajanthony wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2023 5:18 amHi Dallas,
I do have one question. I run 2 separate automation rules, one for lays and one for back bets. Each rule has two possible choices but I have conditions that only allow only one choice to be executed. The condition only allows 1 matched bet on the back bet and 1 matched bet on the lay. I am happy to allow 1 lay and 1 back at the same time so do I have to make the conditions so that it allows two matched bets across both automation rules or do they work totally independent which would then allow one matched bet on each automation. Do you get what I mean?
Regards,
Anthony
-
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2022 9:40 am
this is an interesting one
the most consistent one for me
is Form 44 or worse for F1 with odds 1.50/3.50 (lay)
tends to run no more than 4 losses -- if exceeds 4 losses pause for the day
Same form patterns work poorly elsewhere
1 or 2 is extremely streaky - you can win $1000 from $1 bets easily but then it will lose $700 without a winner as well (back)
Honestly this sort of thing is marginal at best .. even with extra filters -- possibly the only addition would be looking at runners with good form where the price more than doubles -- alternatively looking at a steamer type condition - understanding that you would need to focus on accuracy to get the strike rate high enough to offset
the most consistent one for me
is Form 44 or worse for F1 with odds 1.50/3.50 (lay)
tends to run no more than 4 losses -- if exceeds 4 losses pause for the day
Same form patterns work poorly elsewhere
1 or 2 is extremely streaky - you can win $1000 from $1 bets easily but then it will lose $700 without a winner as well (back)
Honestly this sort of thing is marginal at best .. even with extra filters -- possibly the only addition would be looking at runners with good form where the price more than doubles -- alternatively looking at a steamer type condition - understanding that you would need to focus on accuracy to get the strike rate high enough to offset
Hello. Slightly on a tangent. How would a automation rule be created to back or lay runners that are wearing headgear. I've created a "Runners wearing" column in the one click screen, but unable to work out what is needed for automating it in guardian. Is there a similar file i could use & tweak ? Thanks
- jamesedwards
- Posts: 4010
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm
Store a value as text, it's in there under "A selection's wearing".gareth75 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 03, 2025 12:14 amHello. Slightly on a tangent. How would a automation rule be created to back or lay runners that are wearing headgear. I've created a "Runners wearing" column in the one click screen, but unable to work out what is needed for automating it in guardian. Is there a similar file i could use & tweak ? Thanks
Thanks James.jamesedwards wrote: ↑Thu Jul 03, 2025 12:53 amStore a value as text, it's in there under "A selection's wearing".gareth75 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 03, 2025 12:14 amHello. Slightly on a tangent. How would a automation rule be created to back or lay runners that are wearing headgear. I've created a "Runners wearing" column in the one click screen, but unable to work out what is needed for automating it in guardian. Is there a similar file i could use & tweak ? Thanks
Do I need to fill in the other boxes ? in the A selections stored value as txt rule ?
- jamesedwards
- Posts: 4010
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm
I haven't ever worked with this attribute. But most likely you can save the "a selections wearing" as a stored value, and then test for any relevant headgear using "text comparison condition" in the conditions tab.gareth75 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 03, 2025 8:51 amThanks James.jamesedwards wrote: ↑Thu Jul 03, 2025 12:53 amStore a value as text, it's in there under "A selection's wearing".gareth75 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 03, 2025 12:14 amHello. Slightly on a tangent. How would a automation rule be created to back or lay runners that are wearing headgear. I've created a "Runners wearing" column in the one click screen, but unable to work out what is needed for automating it in guardian. Is there a similar file i could use & tweak ? Thanks
Do I need to fill in the other boxes ? in the A selections stored value as txt rule ?