Hi everyone,
First of all, apologies – English isn’t my first language, but I hope this post will still be clear enough to follow.
I’ve been reading this forum for quite a while and have learned a lot about Bet Angel from the discussions here. Over time, I’ve tested many files and strategies. I’ve found some really smart ideas, but in most cases success depends heavily on picking the right match: choose well, and the strategy works; choose poorly, and it fails.
That got me thinking – what if I could design a strategy where match selection is less critical? I’d like to share the result with you today.
Strategy name: Neptune (I tend to name my ideas after planets).
The bot’s main job is to identify matches that are likely to have multiple goals. I do this with a simple odds check on the Over 2.5 market. Once it finds a qualifying match, it passes that information to the other parts of the strategy – Neptune Over 2.5
If the odds suggest a high-scoring game, the next step is for the bot to place a 1-unit bet on the First Half Over 0.5 market. If a goal is scored in the first half, the rest of the bot doesn’t trigger – the timing and odds levels don’t make it worthwhile. In that case, I bank a small profit from that 1-unit stake and the bot moves on to the next match – Neptune FH 0.5
If there’s no goal in the first half, we move to step three: a 1-unit bet on the BTTS-YES market for the second half. Since stats show most goals are scored after the break, this can deliver a strong profit if both teams find the net – Neptune BTTS
However, there will always be matches where, despite looking promising for goals, things remain scoreless for a long time. If there’s still no goal by the 65th–75th minute, the bot’s final step is to place a 2-unit back bet on Over 0.5 to secure the position. If at least one goal is scored before full time, we avoid a loss and usually finish with a small profit. - Neptune 0,5over
In summary: This is about finding matches where goals are expected, while covering different scenarios to avoid losses once a goal is scored.
First-half goal → modest profit.
BTTS in the second half → strong profit.
BTTS late in the game → large profit.
The strategy’s two weak spots are:
No goals at all.
No BTTS, with all goals coming in the second half.
If you have ideas or suggestions for improving the bot’s efficiency, please share them in the comments. I’d also be happy to hear your general feedback, as I know my knowledge in this area is far from perfect.
Important: Always run the bot in test mode first to make sure everything is working correctly. It uses low stakes by default, and you can edit it in the usual way.
Good luck, and happy trading!
Neptune
-
beregvaros
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:45 am
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
beregvaros
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:45 am
Sorry, one of the files didn’t upload correctly – here it is.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Hi Beregvaros,
my first impression is: ok a thought process is there and an execution process as started to be developed, and it looks like your not afraid of the software and quite happy to get amongst it.
My main observations on first glance:
it looks like you are only using one criteria for picking games, maybe look at others that are also readily available: obvious ones include - predicted goals to be scored, CS odds for 1-1, match odds favs, HT 0-0 scores....... this may help tighten selection and and reduce scattergun approach?
Why BTTS? if you think high goals, what happens if all scored by one side, is a CS trade or an Overs/Unders trade an option instead?
Are you placing monies just to win... not trade out/green up/accept a loss..... do you want to take consistent smaller winnings or realistically just bet you've made the right choice? - think exit strategies.
Bankroll management ....% of bank, or fixed liabilities?
Are you considering market volumes? some leagues/games have very low liability - therefore a smaller chance of getting matched,
Do you need 3 different baf files? can you put them under one, and just use the Text Comparison condition to identify the market name? keeps everything a little cleaner?
Just some of my partially uneducated thoughts....I'm no expert and there is a huge amount of more experience on here that may be able to point you onwards.
Good Luck
Taff
my first impression is: ok a thought process is there and an execution process as started to be developed, and it looks like your not afraid of the software and quite happy to get amongst it.
My main observations on first glance:
it looks like you are only using one criteria for picking games, maybe look at others that are also readily available: obvious ones include - predicted goals to be scored, CS odds for 1-1, match odds favs, HT 0-0 scores....... this may help tighten selection and and reduce scattergun approach?
Why BTTS? if you think high goals, what happens if all scored by one side, is a CS trade or an Overs/Unders trade an option instead?
Are you placing monies just to win... not trade out/green up/accept a loss..... do you want to take consistent smaller winnings or realistically just bet you've made the right choice? - think exit strategies.
Bankroll management ....% of bank, or fixed liabilities?
Are you considering market volumes? some leagues/games have very low liability - therefore a smaller chance of getting matched,
Do you need 3 different baf files? can you put them under one, and just use the Text Comparison condition to identify the market name? keeps everything a little cleaner?
Just some of my partially uneducated thoughts....I'm no expert and there is a huge amount of more experience on here that may be able to point you onwards.
Good Luck
Taff