Building First Tennis Bot - Lay First Set Winner - Help/Advice?

kikiwillmo88
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2024 11:10 am

Thanks Dallas. Have made sure the capitalisation is correct. Will let you know if it works when triggered.

Still getting this issue today where Lay bet and Back Bet 1 are triggering on the same market? This didn't happen yesterday on about 25 market but has happened 4 times today and cannot see why Back bet 1 is triggering on the below market for instance?

The strange this is it has happened on 30 markets today, same bot etc.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
kikiwillmo88
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2024 11:10 am

Also still having an issue with the back bet 2 triggering. The below match qualified.

Very odd.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
kikiwillmo88
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2024 11:10 am

Here is the BOT in it's current state if you want to have a look if it's easier.
Lay Set 1 Winner New.baf
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
jamesedwards
Posts: 4607
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm

kikiwillmo88 wrote:
Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:40 pm
Here is the BOT in it's current state if you want to have a look if it's easier.

Lay Set 1 Winner New.baf
Back bet wont trigger because the lay bet will have already been triggered and you have a condition on the back bet that the number of place bet triggers in the market is equal to 0. Perhaps you meant to check place triggers against the selection rather than the market?

I recommend you run with the assumption that Bet Angel doesn't make mistakes, it's us humans that get it wrong. If something is not triggering correctly then go through and recheck every line to find the error.
User avatar
jamesedwards
Posts: 4607
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm

kikiwillmo88 wrote:
Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:40 pm
Here is the BOT in it's current state if you want to have a look if it's easier.

Lay Set 1 Winner New.baf
Also, probably your fixed odds selection needs to be checked to "current (any selection)". You currently have this set in multiple places to "nominated - any selection" which I think may be causing Bet Angel to interrogate both players odds to find one that meets the condition. This may explain why your back and/or lay bets have been triggering erroneously.
kikiwillmo88
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2024 11:10 am

Thanks for this.

Have changed these settings and running on a few test matches, immediately triggered both back and lay?

Do you have any advice on the 60/40 split?

Or perhaps how to delay a bet from being taken in the market? E.g I have created a second rules file where it backs set 2 winner for a small amount, issue is it is often triggering before this rule. Then it is being greened up with the rest
kikiwillmo88
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2024 11:10 am

[/quote]

Also, probably your fixed odds selection needs to be checked to "current (any selection)". You currently have this set in multiple places to "nominated - any selection" which I think may be causing Bet Angel to interrogate both players odds to find one that meets the condition. This may explain why your back and/or lay bets have been triggering erroneously.
[/quote]

Made the changes but still seem to be getting the double trigger. See below...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
kikiwillmo88
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2024 11:10 am

Few more
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
jamesedwards
Posts: 4607
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm

kikiwillmo88 wrote:
Wed Aug 20, 2025 1:02 pm
Also, probably your fixed odds selection needs to be checked to "current (any selection)". You currently have this set in multiple places to "nominated - any selection" which I think may be causing Bet Angel to interrogate both players odds to find one that meets the condition. This may explain why your back and/or lay bets have been triggering erroneously.
[/quote]

Made the changes but still seem to be getting the double trigger. See below...
[/quote]

Is the double trigger not what you wanted?

Why would you care whether you are laying the 1st set winner or backing the 1st set loser? They are both the same thing?
kikiwillmo88
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2024 11:10 am

Sorry, no

Bot should

- Lay First Set Winner if odds are1.5 or below - If not, Back First set loser 1.8 or higher.
- If a lay bet is placed there is no exit. The fixed stake is risked.
- If back bet is placed Trade out if loss reaches 30% of stake. or green out at end of 2nd set.
- If first set loser wins second set green up by skewing 60/40 onto 2nd winner.

I currently, despite the help of Dallas cannot get the 60/40 to skew profits and recently it had randomly started triggering the lay and back bet at the end of the 1st set.
User avatar
jamesedwards
Posts: 4607
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm

kikiwillmo88 wrote:
Wed Aug 20, 2025 1:53 pm
Sorry, no

Bot should

- Lay First Set Winner if odds are1.5 or below - If not, Back First set loser 1.8 or higher.
- If a lay bet is placed there is no exit. The fixed stake is risked.
- If back bet is placed Trade out if loss reaches 30% of stake. or green out at end of 2nd set.
- If first set loser wins second set green up by skewing 60/40 onto 2nd winner.

I currently, despite the help of Dallas cannot get the 60/40 to skew profits and recently it had randomly started triggering the lay and back bet at the end of the 1st set.
Do you realise that laying the 1st set winner is the same as backing the 1st set loser? Why one set of rules for one and another for the other?
User avatar
jamesedwards
Posts: 4607
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm

You might find it easier to follow a different logic. Perhaps try doing something like this? (not tested)
Lay Set 1 Winner New v1.02.baf
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
kikiwillmo88
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2024 11:10 am

jamesedwards wrote:
Wed Aug 20, 2025 2:26 pm
kikiwillmo88 wrote:
Wed Aug 20, 2025 1:53 pm
Sorry, no


Do you realise that laying the 1st set winner is the same as backing the 1st set loser? Why one set of rules for one and another for the other?
Yes you are right.

It's something I adopted when testing manually and found it easier to understand.
kikiwillmo88
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2024 11:10 am

jamesedwards wrote:
Wed Aug 20, 2025 2:43 pm
You might find it easier to follow a different logic. Perhaps try doing something like this? (not tested)

Lay Set 1 Winner New v1.02.baf
I will set this up and run as a test today. Have you just made this?

Does it skew 60/40 onto set 2 winner? According to my data for 3 months of forward testing and 6 months of back testing this is what gives you the best outcome.
User avatar
jamesedwards
Posts: 4607
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm

kikiwillmo88 wrote:
Wed Aug 20, 2025 3:02 pm
jamesedwards wrote:
Wed Aug 20, 2025 2:43 pm
You might find it easier to follow a different logic. Perhaps try doing something like this? (not tested)

Lay Set 1 Winner New v1.02.baf
I will set this up and run as a test today. Have you just made this?

Does it skew 60/40 onto set 2 winner? According to my data for 3 months of forward testing and 6 months of back testing this is what gives you the best outcome.
Not yet the 60/40, but it should do everything else.

But based on your logic you would never reach the 60/40 requirement:
- If back bet is placed Trade out if loss reaches 30% of stake or green out at end of 2nd set.
- If first set loser wins second set green up by skewing 60/40 onto 2nd winner.


System would green out at the end of the second set before it had a chance to skew 60/40.
Post Reply

Return to “Bet Angel Automation - Tennis”