AI bubble

[Euler]

Lots of chatter about whether or not we are in another bubble, this time caused by interest in 'AI stocks'.

Personally, I've seen this all before, and I think we are. But there will be winners; you just have to avoid the most obvious errors.

My personal playbook is from what I saw in the Dot Com boom.

Slowly but surely people work their way around various stocks, making the case for why it's the next AI winner. People start buying and when the price moves, people pile in and push the price higher. But eventually the price will have to revert unless earnings follow.

But in the short term, there is plenty of upside if you can spot the next mover. Even if you can't buy many different things will see you sit on a small loss or gain, but with the occasional big winner.

Just don't be tempted to sit on them for too long.

[ruthlessimon]

Will it boom? Yes.
Will it crash? Yes.
Will central banks save the day? Also yes.

Assetless cash hoarding wagies will pay the tab.

[ruthlessimon]

I'm so jealous of these people

[Euler]

Will it boom? Yes.
Will it crash? Yes.
Will central banks save the day? Also yes.

Assetless cash hoarding wagies will pay the tab.

There was no bail out of the dot com bubble, though the fed did ease interest rates.

Nobody should be bailed out of overpaying for stock. But leverage makes things so much worse than it should be.

[Kai]

I'm so jealous of these people

Great memers

And the real mavericks

[Euler]

There are a lot of things that have been 'revalued' significantly recently.

I've been buying up positions in aligned industries because it feels like any could pop up at any moment.

It's a bit mad at the moment, which is why it feels like a bubble to me. Prices big up way beyond potential earnings increases.

[sionascaig]

I found the following interesting:

https://www.morganstanley.com/im/en-us/ ... arket.html

Key takeaways for me:

Screenshot 2025-10-12 091658.png

Screenshot 2025-10-12 092305.png

Screenshot 2025-10-12 091749.png

==> not a great time for longer term investment returns, if buying now..

[ruthlessimon]

I remember value investors calling Nvidia the “next Cisco” at $40 based on P/E. Some shorted and got wrecked. What they missed: Nvidia kept hitting and beating earnings estimates.

[ruthlessimon]

There was no bail out of the dot com bubble, though the fed did ease interest rates.

Nobody should be bailed out of overpaying for stock. But leverage makes things so much worse than it should be.

Imho 2008 and investment apps have changed the game.

It doesn’t matter if the bubble is speculative, because the reverse wealth effect would cripple western economies.

S&P 500 drops 50% → average Joe feels poorer → consumer spending collapses → businesses miss earnings → unemployment spikes → governments can’t afford higher yields → cue the money printer.

The game is rigged. capitalism is now socialism for the rich (risks are outsourced, gains aren’t)

Heads: AI takes off - investors win big.
Tails: AI fails - policymakers defend the market. Or they get voted out.

[Euler]

Businesses that make bad decisions should be allowed to fail, thereby putting moral hazard back into the system.

But in 2008, we faced a difficult choice: bail out with a slightly uneven payoff or let the entire economy collapse, creating a dire situation. So it was the lesser of two evils.

The role of government in the current cycle should be to say, if you have a punt on any of these stocks, you could lose everything, and we are not going to help you.

Personally, I believe encouraging investment and risk-taking is good in the long term, but you need moral hazard. I don't believe making everybody the same leads to better outcomes in the long term.

[ruthlessimon]

Some speculative stocks will never recover - Zoom is a prime example. But imo the big s&p 500 players are effectively backstopped. Hence why they trade more like bonds these days.

Small caps: Capitalism
Large caps: Policy instruments