Chat GPT & Generative AI tools

A dedicated space to explore and discuss how cutting-edge technologies are reshaping sports trading and betting strategies. Collaborate on innovative ideas, and stay ahead of the curve in a rapidly evolving landscape.
Post Reply
User avatar
firlandsfarm
Posts: 3451
Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am

Big Bad Barney wrote:
Sun Oct 26, 2025 8:26 pm
IMO Claude Code (anthropic) is the go for coding atm. It's good because it has access to your filesystem. (Some people might care about privacy...I don't...)

You obviously wanna know what you are doing or it'll make a mess...but if it fks up, ya just revert and try again... It's exceptionally good at writing things from scratch, but gets less good as your app gets more complex or ambiguous. One ends up spending their time documenting coding standards, rather than actually coding....then it gets a bit boring repeating, 'follow this directive you...suck...get it right... ok thx'

But still 50% faster than doing it yourself.... :)

ChatGPT is cheaper because one quickly ends up on the max plan with anthropic.

Edit: The real advantage of these tools is learning... learning to code is never just the syntax, it's the patterns and practices and architectures that REALLY take ages to learn.......IMO one would do well to short places like Pluralsight for learning those things.... that used to be the goto... LLM's do it better.
The problem I've found with using it for coding is stopping it running away with itself. l guess it thinks it's being helpful by designing something from scratch through to finished product without asking you if it's on the right track and more worrying without checking not just that it's good but making sure you understand what it doing and how. I find I have to keep asking it to explain what its doing and dragging it back to what I want. Yeah, it's ideas may be right or they may not and I want to be able to check which is which. I think getting it to code without explanation is very dangerous.

Thanks for the Claude tip, maybe I should check it out.
User avatar
Big Bad Barney
Posts: 345
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 6:00 am

firlandsfarm wrote:
Sun Oct 26, 2025 9:12 pm
The problem I've found with using it for coding is stopping it running away with itself. l guess it thinks it's being helpful by designing something from scratch through to finished product without asking you if it's on the right track and more worrying without checking not just that it's good but making sure you understand what it doing and how. I find I have to keep asking it to explain what its doing and dragging it back to what I want. Yeah, it's ideas may be right or they may not and I want to be able to check which is which. I think getting it to code without explanation is very dangerous.

Thanks for the Claude tip, maybe I should check it out.
In my corporate day job I was using ChatGPT and cut pasting a lot...(AI policies and privacy concerns, etc)......for my own stuff Claude is the go...100x better....

Claude WILL run away from you also if you let it....it's solution to that is plan mode...you switch in and out of it it...in plan mode it won't do anything but plan and tell you what it's going to do.... then at the end you tell it yay or ney.......you could if you desired, just stay in plan mode and learn all day long.......but yeah...my experience is the same....the challenge is keeping it consistent, keeping it on track........

The way I get around that is document coding styles and architecture examples and EVERY PROMPT, I tell it about the relevant important ones.....because it does forget... even when you setup pre/post command hooks, etc......it's too much info for it to cope....
User avatar
firlandsfarm
Posts: 3451
Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am

Big Bad Barney wrote:
Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:38 am
In my corporate day job I was using ChatGPT and cut pasting a lot...(AI policies and privacy concerns, etc)......for my own stuff Claude is the go...100x better....

Claude WILL run away from you also if you let it....it's solution to that is plan mode...you switch in and out of it it...in plan mode it won't do anything but plan and tell you what it's going to do.... then at the end you tell it yay or ney.......you could if you desired, just stay in plan mode and learn all day long.......but yeah...my experience is the same....the challenge is keeping it consistent, keeping it on track........

The way I get around that is document coding styles and architecture examples and EVERY PROMPT, I tell it about the relevant important ones.....because it does forget... even when you setup pre/post command hooks, etc......it's too much info for it to cope....
I'm in the middle of something just now, Phase 2 is about to start ... maybe I'll give Claude a go and see how it handles it. Thanks for the suggestion.
User avatar
firlandsfarm
Posts: 3451
Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am

firlandsfarm wrote:
Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:57 am
I'm in the middle of something just now, Phase 2 is about to start ... maybe I'll give Claude a go and see how it handles it. Thanks for the suggestion.
OK, took Claude around the block as a 'Pro' and initially liked it.

It was fast and easier to follow than ChatGPT but it was just as verbose and continually repeated itself if I queried a point in a response by answering my point but then repeating everything from the earlier response as if I hadn't noticed them (I prefer to pick up one point at a time, with ChatGPT I find if my response to it gets too long it seems to forget to answer some of my issues}.

But then came the shock of being told I had run out of allowed conversation! On querying what the problem was the 'token' system was explained ... it seemed to me Claude had used most of the tokens with it's verbosity! The irony (stupidity?) was it ended the conversation when producing a summary of three long responses and there wasn't enough tokens left to complete the summary.

Unbelievably I was told to start a new convo. and summarise the previous convo by manually copying sections from the old into the new! I started the new convo by copying the whole previous convo and pasting it as the opening prompt for the new convo requesting a summary which it performed satisfactorily. (I must say I prefer it's layout of a summary and it's use of colour and in this context I appreciate it's verbosity by producing longer, more detailed summaries than ChatGPT which I find a little too short sometimes.)

I discussed the inefficiency of the curtailing of a conversation only for it to be summarised and reposted into a new conversation for continuity of content. It agreed with me! Maybe I had flogged it into a mindset of "let's agree with this guy and get rid of him"! :lol: Anyway that's how I will be using Claude in the future ... copy a related previous convo and add it into the new convo. maybe as a file rather than pasting thinking pasting will use more of the 'tokens'.
Post Reply

Return to “AI, Machine Learning and Generative AI”