Starting points for implementing ML/AI into sports trading

A dedicated space to explore and discuss how cutting-edge technologies are reshaping sports trading and betting strategies. Collaborate on innovative ideas, and stay ahead of the curve in a rapidly evolving landscape.
Post Reply
eightbo
Posts: 2275
Joined: Sun May 17, 2015 8:19 pm

Can't help but feel a tad behind when I see videos like the below.

https://x.com/ArchiveExplorer/status/20 ... 4791854194

What would you guys recommend as a starting point for implementing ML/AI into my trading?
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 27382
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm

I think a lot of posts like this aren't true or realistic. Of course the buzzword is AI at the moment and everybody's using it in every form possible but none of the strategies I've developed over the last 20 years have involved using machine learning or AI.

I'm not saying that you shouldn't give it a try or that you shouldn't explore new areas and so on. I'm just a bit sceptical, given the level of focus on these things, that people are using it the way they claim they are.

IMO If you learn to use some of the latest tools, you can use them to gather and analyze data much faster than you ever could have done in the past. I think that's a really unexplored area for a lot of people. That's where you'll find a few edges.
User avatar
jamesedwards
Posts: 5903
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm

You don't sell something you believe makes 200% per week.

Ask them to share a longer term P&L and see what happens. :lol:
eightbo
Posts: 2275
Joined: Sun May 17, 2015 8:19 pm

Euler wrote:
Thu Jun 18, 2026 8:35 pm
...
IMO If you learn to use some of the latest tools, you can use them to gather and analyze data much faster than you ever could have done in the past. I think that's a really unexplored area for a lot of people. That's where you'll find a few edges.
Thanks Peter, that's of great help.

I recall seeing you mention somewhere you almost doubled a year-to-year profit somewhere and was just so curious! I'll assume this sort of thing this was a contributor.

Thanks so much for starting BA. 22 years at the forefront of the exchange, and transformed so many lives with your team/product over the years. So grateful.
eightbo
Posts: 2275
Joined: Sun May 17, 2015 8:19 pm

jamesedwards wrote:
Thu Jun 18, 2026 9:04 pm
You don't sell something you believe makes 200% per week.

Ask them to share a longer term P&L and see what happens. :lol:
It's more highlighting a proof of concept (code converting stream into TPD-like data)

I presume a few are on GPT-4o or Claude 3.5 Sonnet paid models? Let me know if you guys have gotten on well with anything else or that presumption is incorrect
User avatar
ShaunWhite
Posts: 10762
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am

eightbo wrote:
Fri Jun 19, 2026 3:51 am
It's more highlighting a proof of concept (code converting stream into TPD-like data)

I presume a few are on GPT-4o or Claude 3.5 Sonnet paid models? Let me know if you guys have gotten on well with anything else or that presumption is incorrect
Doing pretty well but haven't touched it for about 6 months cos I haven't been well/been busy. Back on it soon.

But two key things, #1 data obviously, as much as possible, and #2 having a clear idea about what you want it to do. It's not going to find a stragegy for you, but it can help you refine one. And execution is a factor too, ie are you going to go fully auto incl retraining, through to just daily notes, depends how much time you want to put into it. I was quite well placed with years of tick data and a sim/trading system so that informed my choices.

AI will help get the code together and streamline your process, there'll be a lot of iterations so it's best to be slick, and then choose an ML. I'm on TFT modelling (google it) but there's several, DeepAR, N-BEATS, TiDE etc etc.

One small glitch is that non of the temporal forecasting models understand that more than one selection constitutes a 'race' and the overround, but you can work around it.

Model training can be slow, anything from 15mins for a short data history with a handful of parameters to a several days for a few years of data, 100s of model params and 20 or more iterations (epochs).

Live price inference speed can be an issue too depending on the parameter library, from about 80ms for a simple model to 3 or more seconds for a complex one, so that affects how you use it. If you'll looking for best performance then you could easily spend several hundred a month on AWS GPUs.

It's good though, makes a change and takes away a lot of the tedious analysis.
User avatar
Kai
Posts: 7352
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:21 pm

eightbo wrote:
Fri Jun 19, 2026 3:51 am
I presume a few are on GPT-4o or Claude 3.5 Sonnet paid models? Let me know if you guys have gotten on well with anything else or that presumption is incorrect
My quant partner swears by the ChatGPT Pro and it keeps impressing, we've been using it to good effect recently

The freebie stuff would lose coherence instantly, it's only good for queries like "will ice cream give me brain freeze"
sniffer66
Posts: 1939
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 8:37 am

Kai wrote:
Fri Jun 19, 2026 2:52 pm
eightbo wrote:
Fri Jun 19, 2026 3:51 am
I presume a few are on GPT-4o or Claude 3.5 Sonnet paid models? Let me know if you guys have gotten on well with anything else or that presumption is incorrect
My quant partner swears by the ChatGPT Pro and it keeps impressing, we've been using it to good effect recently

The freebie stuff would lose coherence instantly, it's only good for queries like "will ice cream give me brain freeze"
I still have this argument with GPT 5.5 on a regular basis , then have to go back and correct it's code constantly !

Screenshot 2026-06-19 174526.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
ShaunWhite
Posts: 10762
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am

sniffer66 wrote:
Fri Jun 19, 2026 5:47 pm

I still have this argument with GPT 5.5 on a regular basis , then have to go back and correct it's code constantly !


Screenshot 2026-06-19 174526.jpg
It'll often revert to 'price' being a price like a share price, where higher is indeed worse. '(decimal) odds' leaves it in no doubt what you're on about. Using 'price' requires it to remember the context.
sniffer66
Posts: 1939
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 8:37 am

ShaunWhite wrote:
Fri Jun 19, 2026 6:27 pm
sniffer66 wrote:
Fri Jun 19, 2026 5:47 pm

I still have this argument with GPT 5.5 on a regular basis , then have to go back and correct it's code constantly !


Screenshot 2026-06-19 174526.jpg
It'll often revert to 'price' being a price like a share price, where higher is indeed worse. '(decimal) odds' leaves it in no doubt what you're on about. Using 'price' requires it to remember the context.

I'll try that Shaun. I've told it to remember a good few times but it still loses the memory between chats
Post Reply

Return to “AI, Machine Learning and Generative AI”