Somebody hit a nasty fat finger in the Kempton 17:33.
No 5 - One of the Boys was taken down from 120 to 1.01 50 yards out. No 4 was the clear winner and no colour clash so perhaps a misclick rather than identification confusion?
£6k traded at the minimum.
One Of The Boys
Price To Back To Lay Traded Backers' Stake Layers' Liability
1.01 £5,958.90
1.02 £452.85
1.03 £993.42
1.04 £199.50
1.05 £262.84
1.06 £6.66
1.08 £200.00
1.1 £118.68
Today's Horse Racing
- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
Fairyhouse 20:30
You know you are on a winner when low-priced 'lays' go unmatched
You know you are on a winner when low-priced 'lays' go unmatched
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by ForFolksSake on Thu Jul 09, 2026 9:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
A couple of times on Australian racing I had a situation where I couldn't see the video for the race and watching the market thought I'd backed a winner. On both occasions the horses went down to 1.01 on the lay side with no offers on the back side only to finish second.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2026 9:14 pmFairyhouse 20:30
You know you are on a winner when low-priced 'lays' are unmatched
ContraryToLaw.JPG
- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
I'm using 'reverse market price'ANGELS15 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 09, 2026 9:35 amA couple of times on Australian racing I had a situation where I couldn't see the video for the race and watching the market thought I'd backed a winner. On both occasions the horses went down to 1.01 on the lay side with no offers on the back side only to finish second.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2026 9:14 pmFairyhouse 20:30
You know you are on a winner when low-priced 'lays' are unmatched
ContraryToLaw.JPG
If I get any that go lower I'll post them up
