HUNT 15:10
-
giulio2010
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:11 am
I m probably reading the stats incorrectly..RED CURRENT paid 4,7 seems very short...too short perhaps..I don't know..I leave it to experts..
-
giulio2010
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:11 am
It was too short indeed...It would be nice to hear from some experts as well..It was quite bizarre to see that price, I felt like I was reading some wrong informations but I was not...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
superfrank
- Posts: 2762
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:28 pm
'no expert but how much money was matched at 70? probably about ten quid.
-
giulio2010
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:11 am
Forget about the graph..I am not talking about 10cents matched at 70 to 1 but the horse real chance to win the race...
4,7 in my opinion was very short...Perhaps even 10/1 was short...I am looking to find out more infos about this short price bizarreness for future similar market behaviour, even for personal curiosity...A horse that in 80 runs was paid only 5 times, in it's lifetime, that short ( 2006,2007,2007,2008,2009) and all in flat races, find it self almost favorite at HUNT against some better horses on the field..
The horse was pulled out before next opened..
4,7 in my opinion was very short...Perhaps even 10/1 was short...I am looking to find out more infos about this short price bizarreness for future similar market behaviour, even for personal curiosity...A horse that in 80 runs was paid only 5 times, in it's lifetime, that short ( 2006,2007,2007,2008,2009) and all in flat races, find it self almost favorite at HUNT against some better horses on the field..
The horse was pulled out before next opened..
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.