Suggestion - Old fashion layout not flexible nor practical

[blessedowl]

1 - Ladder with only 23 steps is short. I would like to have a Ladder with much more steps.

2 - The friese with lots of settings is too static, mandatory, without flexibility.

We look at the actual layout of Bet Angerl and see that the features had been added to the apllication along the time, but now we have an application with very low usability, and expensive when comparing with other softwares. It would be wise to force a quality jump in Bet Angel improving its layout. The features are there, are amazing, the way they are offered to the users, is not the best.

Please read this as a positive opinion of a 2 years old subscriber/user that would like to see this software even better.

[Euler]

You can undock the ladder to get more rows or change the row size in settings to increase them to as many as you wish. Its just down to the size that you have the ladder window. It automatically re-sizes for you.

[6thSense]

1 - Ladder with only 23 steps is short. I would like to have a Ladder with much more steps.

Here is my undocked ladder with the settings editor set to 'Standard Rows'.

52 steps unless I miscounted.

ladder.JPG