Or as others might say ...... Fooled by randomnessZenyatta wrote: "Poker is all about people who think they're favourites when they're not", Dwan told me. "People can have some pretty deluded views on poker."
And from Darse Billings: "There is no other game that I know of where humans are so smug, and think that they just play like wizards, and then play so badly,", he told me. "Basically it's because they don't know anything, and think they must be Godlike, and the truth is that they aren't."
Most preferable system
Never done something like that. I'm not a beta either (master degree in law). I'm going to try it before next weekend. We'll see...Ferru123 wrote:If you haven't done so, it might be worth doing a statistical test (such as Chi squared), to see whether that could realistically be due to randomness.
Jeff
Well....I've played poker online for a few years on a good level. But Poker isn't all about mathematical decicions. It's also about judging your opponent and your opinion on how your opponent reacts on certain moves (bets).Zenyatta wrote:...It really shows how tough online poker nowadays...remember Nate is a mathematical genius and even he can't win at poker online any more.
But I agree. Poker is a lot tougher nowadays.
Okay I've read some information on the internet. The programm SPSS is very useful I found out. But then what...is there anyone who could get me on the right track?Charon wrote:Never done something like that. I'm not a beta either (master degree in law). I'm going to try it before next weekend. We'll see...Ferru123 wrote:If you haven't done so, it might be worth doing a statistical test (such as Chi squared), to see whether that could realistically be due to randomness.
Jeff
That part isn't the problem. The problem is: which data do I put in?Ferru123 wrote:It's possible to create a spreadsheet that does the Chi test (as I once did it), although it is a bit fiddley...
JeffCharon wrote: Anyone?I really can't get a start (Chi Test). What data is useful?
