Hi,
Been trying to get a view on my progress over the past year and wondered what the experienced people out there would consider a good return on bank.
I think I remember a similar thread a couple of years ago where it was thought that a profit of 10% of bank as a daily average was considered to be reasonably good.
Just wondered whether this was still thought to be the case. I appreciate there is obviously an upper limit on this but I'm talking generally with a realistic trading bank.
Any thoughts appreciated.
Profit as a % of Bank
- Sunnyclimes
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 1:28 pm
Walshy,
If you returned 3% each trading day, and compounded the interest, you would double your bank in 25 days.
Personally I think that this is an unreasonably high target. Even inexperienced people will know that the higher the potential return, the higher the risk.
Personally I could double my bank in one day but I would be taking unacceptably high risks which when replicated day after day would lead to high losses.
Therefore it is not so much about targetting a daily return, but rather it is about adopting a methodology and finding an edge which over a year will generate a profit. Once you have found that edge you then need to see if it scales up.
In other words, it does not work for me to target a return, but rather start with your methodology and then see what your return becomes.
I hope that helps.
Regards,
Sunnyclimes
If you returned 3% each trading day, and compounded the interest, you would double your bank in 25 days.
Personally I think that this is an unreasonably high target. Even inexperienced people will know that the higher the potential return, the higher the risk.
Personally I could double my bank in one day but I would be taking unacceptably high risks which when replicated day after day would lead to high losses.
Therefore it is not so much about targetting a daily return, but rather it is about adopting a methodology and finding an edge which over a year will generate a profit. Once you have found that edge you then need to see if it scales up.
In other words, it does not work for me to target a return, but rather start with your methodology and then see what your return becomes.
I hope that helps.
Regards,
Sunnyclimes
- superfrank
- Posts: 2762
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:28 pm
it kind of depends on how much of your trading bank you utilise and how often.
it can be a pretty meaningless measure.
i prefer to use other measures to monitor performance.
e.g.
(profits / (profits + losses)) * 100
to get a profits percentage (100% = no losses, 50% = breakeven).
i consider anything above 80 to be a good day/week/month and anything under 60 a bad one (horse racing).
i'm sure there are much better measures that others use.
it can be a pretty meaningless measure.
i prefer to use other measures to monitor performance.
e.g.
(profits / (profits + losses)) * 100
to get a profits percentage (100% = no losses, 50% = breakeven).
i consider anything above 80 to be a good day/week/month and anything under 60 a bad one (horse racing).
i'm sure there are much better measures that others use.
Depending on your trading style it is actually possible to work out your max profit or loss. If you mess around completely at random you will break even but lose a little due to commission. Most traders end up earning relatively small % returns on total turnover.
Thanks for the replys fellas. Its interesting seeing how other people evaluate their performance. I've been looking at it from a point of view of my bank is x amount Im averaging an x% daily return on it, but maybe thats not the best way to look at it or that that approach is mainly suited to a small bank.
I suppose there is no right or wrong way of doing it really, as its only a benchmark to judge current performance against previous. I just wondered if there was a generally agreed amount that a competent trader should achieve.
Thanks again for the replys
I suppose there is no right or wrong way of doing it really, as its only a benchmark to judge current performance against previous. I just wondered if there was a generally agreed amount that a competent trader should achieve.
Thanks again for the replys
-
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 7:02 am
Hi Walshy,
For me personally I prefer to measure performance as a percentage of turnover.
This way, no matter wether you trade 1 event or 100 events per day, you can directly measure your performance on the basis of volume.
rg
For me personally I prefer to measure performance as a percentage of turnover.
This way, no matter wether you trade 1 event or 100 events per day, you can directly measure your performance on the basis of volume.
rg
-
- Posts: 4619
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:23 pm
I have used to same bank for some time and just look at the Profit and Loss report from Betfair, I tend to use the rolling 30 days.
I have worked out to trade a max return of 2.4% (Pre race trades) and 1.67% per football match (Premier league when there on making a total of 4.07% as the bank growth arrives so does sweaty palms to grow with itEuler wrote:Depending on your trading style it is actually possible to work out your max profit or loss. If you mess around completely at random you will break even but lose a little due to commission. Most traders end up earning relatively small % returns on total turnover.


This is a really interesting subject IMO, how people measure their performance.
Ultimately profits are key because they directly relate to your Salary so to speak. Although so many factors play a part for instance, bank size, risk etc.
However I am interested in recording my % of turnover... anybody have the best way to do this please?
Thanks
Ultimately profits are key because they directly relate to your Salary so to speak. Although so many factors play a part for instance, bank size, risk etc.
However I am interested in recording my % of turnover... anybody have the best way to do this please?
Thanks