It does make me wonder what would happen if they made the subs more affordable. Would it blow the illegal streams out of the water, given the improved quality and lack of buffering\downtimegreenmark wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 11:26 amOk. I thought that might be the answer. And has been for a few years now. Seems Sky etc make so much they don't care that their product is available virtually for free and won;t prosecute suppliers or users of these tech's. That's enlightening in itself. They've given up chasing illegal suppliers and just loaded the costs into the legitmate subscribers.Michael5482 wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 11:19 amDon't need any Sky subscription you just a pay a nice man about £50/£60 and he'll give you access to about 2000 channels including all Sky, sport, film, documentary, ppv events across the globe for a year via an app.
Surely you must know someone who has one or will do it for you?
Same goes for the HMRC as well. I seem to recall them shutting down a department that was recovering untold millions in unpaid tax because "it wasn't cost effective". Instead we all have to pay a little extra to cover the losses