"Dial back to reviewing games where *we* make assumptions regarding the 55 minute mark and you see how absurd this all is...."jimibt wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:07 pmCallum - this is kinda my manta (ESPECIALLY with football). The road is littered with conceived notions on football (we're all armchair experts).CallumPerry wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2019 9:41 pmSo everything that has been mentioned is spot on, great advice which you should 100% pursue. The only thing that struck me enough to pick up on is that line about having a plan. YES absolutely go in with a plan, have an idea for what you think will happen and research well of course BUT if it doesn't happen, don't just leave the game. Look at what is happening and think about WHY it is happening all of the time.JustLukeYou wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2019 10:27 pm
It sounds like each match I need a plan which I think will happen. If it doesn't happen then I abandon the game. Like tonight for example I thought Arminia Bielefeld would win and they were playing the best football. If I was watching Man City on Saturday I'm sure I would have assumed Man City would win even though Wolves had some early chances.
It's that fine line you need to mind between under trading because you're too rigid and not open to looking at what is happening right now in a market and overtrading wildly because you're trying to jump on everything. To conclude, yes go in with a plan but also be flexible and open. Keep an inquisitive mind, trial regularly but do so in a manner where you can analyse whether you're seeing progression in yourself and your results.
However, the real dynamics play out in a cruel fashion (think Spurs, Man City thus far). Therefore, stats, preconceived notions are (almost) useless. This is where the game savants come into play (psychoff springs to mind). Dropping formulas and rigid strategies allows these guys to tag the game and monitor it as they *see* something that they know has a probability of happening. Not because of stats, but because it's unfolding and they have the experience to see a finite number of scenario outcomes.
Dial back to reviewing games where *we* make assumptions regarding the 55 minute mark and you see how absurd this all is....
anyway, just my take![]()
Hi, what do mean by this please?