Better off (most to least)
- An existing PC payer who makes consistently less than £25k gross per year is much better off because they will no longer pay any charge.
- Those will a lifetime bank of winnings who have lost in the last 52 weeks but return to profit will be much better off because EF only takes the last 52 weeks into account.
- An existing 50% or 60% PC payer is much better off due to the scrapping of the higher rates.
- An existing 40% PC payer who makes consistently less than £100k gross per year is much better off because they will now only ever pay 20%.
- An existing 40% PC payer who flirts around £100k gross per year is somewhat better off because they will sometimes pay 20% and sometimes pay 40%.
- An existing 20% PC payer who flirts around £25k gross per year is somewhat better off because they will sometimes pay 20% and sometimes pay nothing.
Worse off (most to least)
- Those with a lifetime bank of losses who are now consistently profitable above £25k gross will be much worse off (if they reach a lifetime gross profit position) because EF only takes the last 52 weeks into account.
- An existing 20% PC payer who makes consistently more than £100k gross per year (these will be very rare) is much worse off because they will now only ever pay 40%.
- An existing 40% PC payer who consistently makes more than £100k gross per year is a little worse off due to the reduction in implied commission rate from 3% to 2.5%.
- An existing 20% PC payer who makes consistently between £25k and £100k gross per year is is a little worse off due to the reduction in implied commission rate from 3% to 2.5%.
Edited to group into those better and those worse off