QUESTION FOR STATISTICIANS AND ANALYSTS

A place to discuss anything.
Post Reply
User avatar
lmf21734
Posts: 38
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 9:22 pm
Contact:

Dear All

I am building a strategy around specific occurrences in football and here is the question.

If Team 1 has a 60% chance of scoring in the the first 20 minutes of a match (based on matches they have played in the season) and a Team 2 also has a 60% chance of scoring in the first 20 minutes of a match then if these 2 teams play against each other is the statistical chance of a goal being scored in the first 20 minutes the mean of the 2 percentages (so 60+60)/2) which is still 60% or is it higher than 60% because you are now bringing 2 likely scenarios into the same event.

Appreciate your thoughts as I am not sure of the answer

MEL
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 26473
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm

You need to work out the chance of neither of them scoring then find the inverse of that joint calculation.
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 26473
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm

Team A scores = 60% not score = 40%

Neither NOT = .4*.4=.16

Therefore, no team scores =16%

Any team to score = 84%
User avatar
gazuty
Posts: 2557
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2011 11:03 am

Euler wrote:Team A scores = 60% not score = 40%

Neither NOT = .4*.4=.16

Therefore, no team scores =16%

Any team to score = 84%
Ahhh stats and logic. Love it.
burntheory
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:49 am

I'm guessing if Team 1 has only conceded a goal in the first 20 mins 10% of the time, and Team 2 20% of the time, the implied probabilities are going to change. Now it looks like there’s a 72% implied probability that neither team concedes a goal in the first 20mins. That leads to the implied probability of a goal to be 28%.

Averaging to two implied probabilities (of a goal) gives a 56% chance of a goal in the first 20mins. As an approximation, this ‘feels’ better than 84%. Whether it actually is better is another matter…
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion”