Hi,
Is there a way in BA automation (without using Excel) to determine if a selections price is at the top or bottom of its range ?
Cheers,
Ranges
Its ok, i figured out how todo it using a combination of Setting signals and Historic Relative Odds. Its not ideal and some would say rather crude but it will stop my automation from entering LAY trades near the top of a selections range and entering BACK trades near the bottom of a selections range.
Just shows you can do wonders when you lay off the Navy Rum.
Just shows you can do wonders when you lay off the Navy Rum.

In very simplistic terms....
- If a selections current LTP is < 6 and a signal is set that previously its LTP was > 7 then don't look to BACK, only look for LAY opportunity's.
- If a selections current LTP is < 5 and a signal is set that previously its LTP was > 6 then don't look to BACK, only look for LAY opportunity's.
- If a selections current LTP is < 4 and a signal is set that previously its LTP was > 5 then don't look to BACK, only look for LAY opportunity's.
- If a selections current LTP is < 3 and a signal is set that previously its LTP was > 4 then don't look to BACK, only look for LAY opportunity's.
- If a selections current LTP is < 2 and a signal is set that previously its LTP was > 3 then don't look to BACK, only look for LAY opportunity's.
etc etc
You need to set signals for each previous price ranges.
Should look something like this. Obviously you need to figure out what exact conditions you open trades on etc.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Like that, agree its a bit cluncky but will give it a go as well!cybernet69 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 09, 2017 2:42 pmShould look something like this. Obviously you need to figure out what exact conditions you open trades on etc.

If only we could set a signal that could identify the price!!


Niko - i fully expect that the BA team have registered immense interest in the extension of signals capabilities and hopefully we'll see a lot of new functionality in v1.50 -fingers x''dNiko wrote: ↑Tue Jul 11, 2017 5:30 amLike that, agree its a bit cluncky but will give it a go as well!cybernet69 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 09, 2017 2:42 pmShould look something like this. Obviously you need to figure out what exact conditions you open trades on etc.![]()
If only we could set a signal that could identify the price!!![]()
![]()
Sorry, had I mentioned it before!jimibt wrote: ↑Tue Jul 11, 2017 9:23 amNiko - i fully expect that the BA team have registered immense interest in the extension of signals capabilities and hopefully we'll see a lot of new functionality in v1.50 -fingers x''dNiko wrote: ↑Tue Jul 11, 2017 5:30 amLike that, agree its a bit cluncky but will give it a go as well!cybernet69 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 09, 2017 2:42 pmShould look something like this. Obviously you need to figure out what exact conditions you open trades on etc.![]()
If only we could set a signal that could identify the price!!![]()
![]()
hmmm - let me think


[edit] - and to recap, that 1.50 wishlist was:
Additional price options:
1. Max Traded Price (PR & IP)
2. Min Traded Price (PR & IP)
3. Most Traded Price (PR & IP)
Extended signals:
1. Last Traded Amount
2. Last Traded Price
3. Comparison between signals [i.e. if (signalA > signalB) or if(signalA > LTP) etc... where signalA and signalB can be any of the above]
Basically, allowing signals to become 1st class citizens. More info contained here: http://www.betangel.com/forum/viewtopic ... 20&t=14168