I havent got a clue what they talking about.

Anyone ever tried to implement it ?

Intersesting read. I've read a very similar paper. probably by the same author, for predicting the outome of tennis matches using machine learning. Also with similar resultsArchery1969 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:46 pmInteresting read at https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/243 ... llText.pdf ?
I havent got a clue what they talking about.![]()
Anyone ever tried to implement it ?![]()
It's sort of what I do, and probably a lot of algo types, ie.test strategies with backtest data, and then use AI (my brain for me!) to tailor/improve. Interesting if you look at the results section you can see the issue most people hit, ie.you train for 3 months of back data, then forward test and it all breaks down!Archery1969 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:46 pmInteresting read at https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/243 ... llText.pdf ?
I havent got a clue what they talking about.![]()
Anyone ever tried to implement it ?![]()
Good point. I just looked at the high level numbers. It's way off
The problem with that article is that it's sort of got the wrong end of the handle hasn't it?sniffer66 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:59 amFound this an interesting read as well, and much less complex
https://medium.com/swlh/predicting-atp- ... e03d99f410
I've been attempting to use the findings in my tennis bots for a few weeks now
I always think the funny thing about a lot of academic papers is how they completely miss the point. It's a sort of intelligence trap.Archery1969 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:46 pmInteresting read at https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/243 ... llText.pdf ?
I havent got a clue what they talking about.![]()
Anyone ever tried to implement it ?![]()
Are you basing that conclusion on percentage in, rather than points won on 1st\2nd serve ?Euler wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 3:48 pmThe problem with that article is that it's sort of got the wrong end of the handle hasn't it?sniffer66 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:59 amFound this an interesting read as well, and much less complex
https://medium.com/swlh/predicting-atp- ... e03d99f410
I've been attempting to use the findings in my tennis bots for a few weeks now
First serve % is directly linked to second serve so there is no need to weight it, the metric exists already.
I'll check my assumption of the article, but that would be me immediate view.
Advanced AMMs (automated market makers) already use variations on this or at least components of it.Archery1969 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:46 pmInteresting read at https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/243 ... llText.pdf ?
I havent got a clue what they talking about.![]()
Anyone ever tried to implement it ?![]()