Has anyone been on http://betting.racingpost.com/?
It looks impressive, especially as it gives each horse's percentage change of winning, and provides a race simulation facility.
However, the 2 facilities seem to be in contradiction! Take this race, for example: http://betting.racingpost.com/horses/ca ... ed_verdict
The site says that Woolcombe Folly has the greatest change of winning. However, the simulator doesn't even show him placing!
BTW, it will be interesting to see whether the RP's estimation of a horse's chance of winning influences the odds available on Betfair...
Jeff
New Racing Post website
Chief Dan George in the same race (the 15:25 at Ascot) also looks interesting.
These are the most frequently placed bets this morning according to the Post:
Imperial Commander 2208 10/11
What A Friend 1288 7/2
Chief Dan George 1058 50/1
This level of betting activity on a rank outsider suggests to me that someone knows something.
You can back him at 66/1 with Hills.
Jeff
These are the most frequently placed bets this morning according to the Post:
Imperial Commander 2208 10/11
What A Friend 1288 7/2
Chief Dan George 1058 50/1
This level of betting activity on a rank outsider suggests to me that someone knows something.
You can back him at 66/1 with Hills.
Jeff
Euler wrote:Having a play, lump on Imperial commander!