The only time of year it's good to see red!
Here are a few of the previous year's threads for anyone wanting a recap
2024 - viewtopic.php?t=29278
2023 - viewtopic.php?t=27500
2022 - viewtopic.php?f=7&t=25714
2021 - viewtopic.php?f=7&t=23791
2020 - viewtopic.php?f=7&t=22064
2019 - viewtopic.php?f=7&t=18926
2018 - viewtopic.php?f=7&t=16502
French Open 2025 - RG25
Not too shabby day 1. Green on 3 red on 1
Decent green on Navone/Nakashima was good for breaks. Did donate back some looking for break backs in 3rd & 4th, momentum appeared to be with Nak before rain delay.
Red on Tirante/Dzumhur, messed up as felt Dzum was going to throw 1st set after a temper-tantrum so hedged on lay @ 0-30 when already a break down in 1st. Did lose it but loss was worse then it should have due to position I put myself into with the 1st hedge.
Small green Michelsen/Cerundolo, nothing worth writing home about.
Decent green Kostyk/Bejlek, Kostyk had down as poor predicted hold.
Liquidity I felt was ok, the gaps mid-point are bigger for the non-TV games bit like rest of season has been, seems to tie in with where BF introduced the no time-delay for bets not at current price.
Decent green on Navone/Nakashima was good for breaks. Did donate back some looking for break backs in 3rd & 4th, momentum appeared to be with Nak before rain delay.
Red on Tirante/Dzumhur, messed up as felt Dzum was going to throw 1st set after a temper-tantrum so hedged on lay @ 0-30 when already a break down in 1st. Did lose it but loss was worse then it should have due to position I put myself into with the 1st hedge.
Small green Michelsen/Cerundolo, nothing worth writing home about.
Decent green Kostyk/Bejlek, Kostyk had down as poor predicted hold.
Liquidity I felt was ok, the gaps mid-point are bigger for the non-TV games bit like rest of season has been, seems to tie in with where BF introduced the no time-delay for bets not at current price.
-
- Posts: 707
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:29 pm
Money into these markets just seems so incredibly fast now. There's one particular punter that is well ahead of the rest too, doesn't make much sense. Interesting also how confident it was in some of the challenged calls yesterday evening. not offering any conspiratorial theory here.. more of a 'things are different aren't they?' post..
Losers with an SP of <=1.50 so far: -
Karolina Muchova - 1.12
Francisco Cerundolo - 1.14
Marta Kostyuk - 1.22
Emma Navarro - 1.25
Maria Sakkari - 1.27
Elise Mertens - 1.28
Daniil Medvedev - 1.28
Moyuka Uchijima - 1.34
Taylor Fritz - 1.34
Moyuka Uchijima - 1.34
Katie Volynets - 1.36
Maximilian Marterer - 1.36
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano - 1.41
Tomas Machac - 1.44
Maya Joint - 1.47
Diane Parry - 1.47
Ons Jabeur - 1.48
Grigor Dimitrov - 1.48
Elina Avanesyan - 1.5
Karolina Muchova - 1.12
Francisco Cerundolo - 1.14
Marta Kostyuk - 1.22
Emma Navarro - 1.25
Maria Sakkari - 1.27
Elise Mertens - 1.28
Daniil Medvedev - 1.28
Moyuka Uchijima - 1.34
Taylor Fritz - 1.34
Moyuka Uchijima - 1.34
Katie Volynets - 1.36
Maximilian Marterer - 1.36
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano - 1.41
Tomas Machac - 1.44
Maya Joint - 1.47
Diane Parry - 1.47
Ons Jabeur - 1.48
Grigor Dimitrov - 1.48
Elina Avanesyan - 1.5
I've always suspected that if you have access to the Hawk-Eye feed, you would know within milliseconds as to whether a shot is in or not. So the temptation to use that data must be overwhelming.Nero Tulip wrote: ↑Wed May 28, 2025 11:49 amMoney into these markets just seems so incredibly fast now. There's one particular punter that is well ahead of the rest too, doesn't make much sense. Interesting also how confident it was in some of the challenged calls yesterday evening. not offering any conspiratorial theory here.. more of a 'things are different aren't they?' post..
Similar issue on Golf.
-
- Posts: 707
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:29 pm
yes i think that what I was hinting at. particularly if you're that confident on a line call, kind of gives the game away a bit. scary stuff.Euler wrote: ↑Wed May 28, 2025 1:14 pmI've always suspected that if you have access to the Hawk-Eye feed, you would know within milliseconds as to whether a shot is in or not. So the temptation to use that data must be overwhelming.Nero Tulip wrote: ↑Wed May 28, 2025 11:49 amMoney into these markets just seems so incredibly fast now. There's one particular punter that is well ahead of the rest too, doesn't make much sense. Interesting also how confident it was in some of the challenged calls yesterday evening. not offering any conspiratorial theory here.. more of a 'things are different aren't they?' post..
Similar issue on Golf.