And BHA withdraw from juditional review of Levy boards decision that exchange users shouldn't pay levy.
http://www.racingpost.com/news/live.sd?event_id=184517
Sounds like good news. William Hill apparantly might continue their crusade but good luck with that!
Betfair and BHA agree deal on funding
-
- Posts: 4619
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:23 pm
Seems the fight isn't over just quite yet:mugsgame wrote:Relieved about this, this was the biggest threat to BF
http://www.markxdavies.com/2012/07/04/c ... ombatants/
Interesting article, given that in the debate on the levy a couple of years ago, only a handful of MPs bothered to turn up, and most of them only did so to talk about their constituency's race course!
Perhaps some MPs feel that the public anger towards the gambling activities of banks might mean that there would now be greater public support for taking a hard line on gambling in other spheres...
Jeff
Perhaps some MPs feel that the public anger towards the gambling activities of banks might mean that there would now be greater public support for taking a hard line on gambling in other spheres...
Jeff
andyfuller wrote: Seems the fight isn't over just quite yet:
http://www.markxdavies.com/2012/07/04/c ... ombatants/
If as Mark says the MP's are going to push through something else they had better hurry up. There is no chance that these muppets will be in Government again anytime soon.andyfuller wrote:Seems the fight isn't over just quite yet:mugsgame wrote:Relieved about this, this was the biggest threat to BF
http://www.markxdavies.com/2012/07/04/c ... ombatants/
It looks like some sort of transaction charge to fund accounts. I googled ithgodden wrote:What's all this one about?mugsgame wrote:If this is the tax to pay money into your account it doesn't apply to me.dav3214 wrote:There is still the 15% point of consumption tax to come though
-
- Posts: 1744
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:28 am
Tax on any overseas operators I guess according to the below
http://pokerfuse.com/news/law-and-regul ... operators/
"Operators anywhere in the world will be required to pay gambling duties on revenue generated from customers based in the UK"
Wont affect me as im overseas.
http://pokerfuse.com/news/law-and-regul ... operators/
"Operators anywhere in the world will be required to pay gambling duties on revenue generated from customers based in the UK"
Wont affect me as im overseas.
-
- Posts: 1744
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:28 am
Following on to that, i think they would find it very hard to implement. I cant see companies overseas declaring everything to the UK.
It's GPT. When Gambling was de-regulated they switched from taxing bets to a tax on gross profits. By going offshore companies were able to avoid this. It is moving to a point of consumption tax, so that will mean there is no benefit for offshoring.
-
- Posts: 4619
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:23 pm
I guess they would try to implement it the American way, step inside this country if you are a director and be meet at the arrival lounge by the boys in blue.steven1976 wrote:Following on to that, i think they would find it very hard to implement. I cant see companies overseas declaring everything to the UK.
The Americans got some pretty high profile figures that way. Also quite a few of the main players are listed on the UK stock markets so I am sure there would be a way of going after them if they don't pay.
My guess is all bar the few would break the law and not pay.