quantum mechanics mystery
Jim Al-Khalili lectures at a university close to me.
I've been very interested in the probabilistic nature of the quantum world for some time.
I have a theory in my head that can unify and explain the probabilistic nature of quantum physics, the weak nature of gravity, entanglement and wave particle duality. But because I don't have a psychics degree I reckon it would never make the light of day, it's probably got lots of holes in it too TBH if it was peer reviewed. But I have found physicists that share the same ideas and have had a bit of dialogue with them having passed myself off for a student!
The crux of the explanation is that it requires multiple universes and dimensions, but it explains all the odd characteristics you see in the quantum world. I reckon it will eventually be proved true that we live in a multi universe, multi dimensional world.
I've been very interested in the probabilistic nature of the quantum world for some time.
I have a theory in my head that can unify and explain the probabilistic nature of quantum physics, the weak nature of gravity, entanglement and wave particle duality. But because I don't have a psychics degree I reckon it would never make the light of day, it's probably got lots of holes in it too TBH if it was peer reviewed. But I have found physicists that share the same ideas and have had a bit of dialogue with them having passed myself off for a student!
The crux of the explanation is that it requires multiple universes and dimensions, but it explains all the odd characteristics you see in the quantum world. I reckon it will eventually be proved true that we live in a multi universe, multi dimensional world.
euler do you have the required maths behind you. when i done my degree (electrical engineering), it touched on some aspects of quantum mechanics; my maths so i thought was pretty sturdy/robust (good enough for engineering), but when you get into that alice in wonder land stuff, its just incomprehensible.
plain english explanations are very inadequate and the maths underlying it apparently explains all very well but, you you need be genius to understand and/or apply it.
if you do have the maths behind i take my hat off to you.
plain english explanations are very inadequate and the maths underlying it apparently explains all very well but, you you need be genius to understand and/or apply it.
if you do have the maths behind i take my hat off to you.
My cousin works on the hadron collider,
it blows my mind when taking to him
I have to say this explanation is more on my level
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu57B1v0SzI
it blows my mind when taking to him
I have to say this explanation is more on my level
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu57B1v0SzI
this one is very cool
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuEY2bm-W50
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuEY2bm-W50