I wouldn't mind so much if he actually charged the likes of Poundland for the free labour his scheme provides, but he doesn't. Basically, he is giving a gift from the taxpayers to corporations, which might actually result in said corporations having fewer people on their payrolls, thereby increasing unemployment!
I'm all for a 'something for something' culture, but if you are going to force the unemployed to work for free then shouldn't they be benefiting the community (by taking part in local environmental initiatives, for example) rather than handed over FOC to big business as slaves?!?
Just thought I'd get that off my chest!

Jeff